Dear Indologists,
In 2016 (Friday, 17 June 2:28pm) I shared the results of the ligature formation produced by several Devanagari fonts. I have just completed a revised comparison and thought it would be useful to share the results of this comparison as well. A PDF of the comparison is available on The Sanskrit Library's Publications page at
https://sanskritlibrary.org/publications.html under the title
Sanskrit characters: a comparison of 12 fonts and their coverage of conjuncts. As previously I compared 1260 ligatures formed by the LaTeX Skt package with seven Unicode fonts. The ligatures compared were the combined set of all those listed by Ulrich Stiehl in his document, Conjunct Consonants in Sanskrit, Heidelberg, 21 April 2003, pp. 4--34, and those listed in the Skt package documentation Sanskrit for LaTeX2e, pp. 22--35. The fonts compared this time add Siddhanta, Sanskrit2020, Shobhika-Regular, and Shobhika-Bold. The full list is as follows:
1. LaTeX Skt package
2. Chandas
3. Uttara
4. Siddhanta
5. Sanskrit2003
6. Sanskrit2020
7. Shobhika-Regular
8. Shobhika-Bold
9. Praja
10. Arial Unicode MS
11. Devanagari MT
12. Mangal
The comparison showed that the Shobhika fonts (Regular and Bold) are able to produce all conjuncts correctly, without the interruption of an inappropriate virāma, with the exception of two ṭty and ṭṣṭh. Siddhanta excepts just four: ṅkṣṇv, ṅkhn, ddbr, l̃l. Chandas and Uttara are able to form all conjuncts correctly with the exception of seven sequences: ṅkṣṇv, ṅrvy, ṭhthy, dḍḍ, ddbr, ddvr, l̃l. The LaTeX Skt package handles all but 29. Sanskrit 2003 lacked 82, Sanskrit 2020 lacks 81, Praja 187, Arial Unicode MS 202, Devanagari MT 232, and Mangal 236.
I also checked the behavior of the fonts in handling the accents in the Devanagari extended, and Vedic extensions Unicode pages. Only Praja font handled them all properly, the LaTeX Skt package handles most Vedic accentuation, Sanskrit 2020 handles all but the Maitrāyaṇī Saṁhitā midstroke. Shobhika handles all but this and the Samaveda accents. Most fonts handled only the common accentual system. A test of Vedic accents with any font can be performed by visiting the Sanskrit Library's interactive Vedic Unicode character phonetic value table at
http://sanskritlibrary.org/accents.html. Simply set your browser to use the font you would like to test.
The first eight fonts listed, i.e. Shobhika, Siddhanta, Chandas, Uttara, LaTeX Skt, Sanskrit 2003 and 2020, and Praja, are therefore commendable; the last three are inadequate for Sanskrit. Mihail Bayaryn's fonts use private code points to handle accents. It would be desirable for him to upgrade his fonts, which otherwise handle conjuncts very comprehensively, to handle the Vedic characters in the two Unicode pages mentioned including in particular the combining candrabindu with semivowels l, y, and v.
Yours,
Peter