Further, no mention of the 1969-1970 edition (first?) is mentioned. Could be perhaps a print error of 2000-2002 reprint?

Il giorno mar 7 giu 2022 alle ore 17:23 Paolo Eugenio Rosati <paoloe.rosati@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Dear Christophe,

thank you. I read Rocher and I am perplexed because in my SP 2002 edition is written:

First edition: Delhi, 1950
Reprint Delhi 1973, 1977, 1981, 1986, 1990, 1993, 1996, 1999, 2002

I would like to fix this thing.

Best,
Paolo

Il giorno mar 7 giu 2022 alle ore 17:16 Christophe Vielle <christophe.vielle@uclouvain.be> ha scritto:

Maybe I am wrong, but J.L. Shastri's "edition" is... the AITM English translation first issued with Motilal in 1969-70 (several reprints; I am surprised by the 1950 date, which appears wrong) and, according to L. Rocher (here attached), "based on the ed. by the Panditapustakalaya, which follows, with emendations, the Venk. ed. of 1906".

Le 7 juin 2022 à 16:56, Paolo Eugenio Rosati via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> a écrit :

Dear all,

Maybe someone can help me with this.:

Shastri, Jagdish L., ed. The Śiva Purāṇa. 4 vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2000–2002, first published in 1950.

should follow Veṅkaṭeśvara edition (1906), but does it has any relationship with  Paṇḍitapustakālaya edition (1963)?

Best,
Paolo

--
Paolo E. Rosati
PhD in Asian and African Studies
Mobile/Whatsapp: (+39) 338 73 83 472
Skype: paoloe.rosati

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology



--
Paolo E. Rosati
PhD in Asian and African Studies
Mobile/Whatsapp: (+39) 338 73 83 472
Skype: paoloe.rosati


--
Paolo E. Rosati
PhD in Asian and African Studies
Mobile/Whatsapp: (+39) 338 73 83 472
Skype: paoloe.rosati