To Whom It May Concern, 
I am writing this letter as I believe it is the most I can do, in the face of what is happening.
Attached is the 2022 calendar for IIT Kharagpur. Kindly take a look at it.
I
 am not a historian, merely an amateur, and hence I cannot 
satisfactorily provide a rebuttal to the 'reinterpretations' of Indian 
history. 
What shocks me 
is how a premier scientific institution of India can allow for such a 
selective reading of history, which absolutely flies in the face of 
scientific rigour, and present a racially/nationally self-flattering 
hypothesis . In these days, racial pride and national pride have become 
one and the same (India 'is an ancient race', after all).
By
 all means, dispel eurocentric readings of history. I am all for presenting a view of history where the indigenous knowledge systems of different civilizations are studied on their own merits and not as appendices to western thought. 
But do we need to 
supplant western supremacist bias with Indian supremacist bias? This 
calendar seems to assume that the current consensus amongst historians 
is that Aryans plundered their way into the country by hacking away at 
Dravidians. That all current historians, barring those associated to 
Vidya Bharati / Sewa Bharati (which are absolutely NOT, IN ANY WAY, 
associated to RSS or BJP), have a view of Indian history steeped in 
cultural inferiority, actively crafted by jealous westerners to chip 
away our collective pride. 
What a convenient strawman to attack current 
historians, who subscribe to nothing of the sort.
Something
 tells me that the majority of historians in India will not respond to 
this calendar either. Pardon me for saying this, but I have seen a 
tendency in 'career experts' - experts and authorities in different 
subjects, be it history or science - to pass off an opportunity to rise 
to an occasion which needed them to act, by pretending that they are 
holding back because of some virtue like 'staying focused' or 'being 
patient' - unless, of course, it is institutional, can be mentioned on 
the CV and faculty page, and pushes them up the career ladder. Then they
 do it because 'they love/care about the subject'.
 
This calendar assumes three things -
- That
 there exists a dominant, presumptive hypothesis called the 'Aryan Invasion 
Theory' - no historian in this day and age, be it a 'communist' historian or as they say, a 'colonial mindset' 
historian, or a 'patriotic' historian, or a 'funded by Catholic Church 
foreigner' historian, or a 'whitewashing Mohammedan carnage' muslim historian, or any other stereotyped historian of any kind, believes in Aryan invasion. The current consensus, which is itself constantly evolving in light of new archaeological evidence and more rigorous interpretations, 
is that a migration took place, gradually, in successive waves, and 
there was no large-scale violence during this period, and Aryan and 
Pre-Aryan (which was more than just 'Dravidian' culture) cultures fused 
and intermixed as cultures often do. But of course, this view of reality
 is inconvenient to those who want to throw 'unpatriotic, spiritually 
parasitic' historians out of India's learning institutions.
 
- The
 Vedas were composed by people who had no biases, no political 
inclinations, no caste/class prejudices, no conflicts of interest, and 
were supreme in all matters of spirituality. And their exegesis in the 
Upanishads were also written by equally transcendental figures.
 
 
- That
 Sri Aurobindo and Swami Vivekananda are historians. If we are to read 
Indian history by what they have to say, then perhaps we should read 
Roman history by what the Pope has to say about it. Of course, they will
 be very unbiased in their views, won't they? 
 
Using
 the same kind of logic used in that calendar, I can also provide very 
convincing interpretations, weaving together real archaeological evidence, of the 
literal existence of a 'now extinct' creature Hydra that the Greek hero Hercules 
fought. In fact, I can even prove that Hercules is just the Greek name 
for Krishna, and Hydra was just Kaliya Nag whom Krishna defeated ! Or that an Egyptian god of 
the dead called Anubis does greet you
 after you die - and is none other than Yamdev, who also tested Yudhisthira ! Or a half-man-half-bull monster created using 'ancient 
gene therapy' which is remembered as the Minotaur of Crete (using 
technology invented by Shiva to transplant Ganesha's head). I 
could also, very easily, using selective evidence, prove that the Earth 
is actually only 6000 years old as the Bible says, and humans and 
dinosaurs lived together - indeed there are entire schools runs by 
people who believe this Biblical nonsense in the US, just as we believe Brahminical rationalizations.
Just
 as European scholars selectively used Greek and Roman history to prove a
 view of Western superiority centuries ago, today we are selectively 
using Indian history to prove a view of Eastern superiority. We are 
fighting racial supremacy with racial supremacy.
We
 seem to believe that India has had a patent on philosophical and 
spiritual thought since time immemorial - why stop at 7000 BCE? Perhaps we were the Vishwa-Guru since Treta Yuga (2 million years ago) when even 
homo sapiens did not exist. Perhaps Ayodhya palace was built by Homo 
Erectus. Or is that too offensive to suggest? Or maybe homo sapiens did 
indeed exist 2 million years ago, but the west conspired to hide the 
fact, so that India never realized how it invented palace-building and 
governance. After all, even the Allahabad High Court had once proclaimed
 that 'Ayodhya temple was probably built by Lord Rama 9 million years 
ago'.
Should
 we start revisiting human evolution to accommodate the fact that the 
Treta-Yuga ended millions of years ago? After all, this calendar seems 
to treat the Vedas as an infallible source composed by rishis who had 
transcended all fallibilities in human judgement.
Maybe Dashavatar are nothing but a mapping of the different evolutionary stages of humans ! Think about it ! Matsya (fish), Kurma (tortoise), Varaha (warthog), Vamana (Homo Erectus ???), Narasimha (Neanderthal ???) - it is evident how this perspective has been suppressed by bolshevik-leaning apparatchiks of Nehru, Indira and the current roster of urban naxals to keep Indian pride from realizing itself !!!
Why
 not go one step further and say that Mount Meru really is the center of
 the world as the Vedas say, and Mt. Everest is a colonial myth? Or 
better yet, say that Meru was the ancient name of Everest?
Should
 we ignore the fact that the overwhelming majority of genetic studies point to the 
fact that there was indeed several waves of migration of Aryan tribes 
into the Indian subcontinent - a MIGRATION which these neo-racialists 
posit as a hypothesis of 'INVASION' in order to discredit it - and the 
fact that the Indus Valley used no language remotely similar to 
Sanskrit?  Or dismiss the majority of the archaeological evidence, 
amongst which a few pieces suggest an alternate hypothesis which these 
neo-racialists so desperately cling to? Or should we believe that the 
first language to have developed on Earth was Sanskrit, and all other 
languages are but inferior copies of it?
This
 new school of 'Indian Knowledge Systems' seems to be hell bent on 
ignoring all evidence that presents a more sober picture of history, and
 crafting a self-glorifying picture of eternal nationhood based on the 
idea that all good on Earth came from India, from kindness to animals to
 brushing one's teeth to philanthropy.
This
 is sad, because I really am an enthusiast of Indian philosophy - actual ancient Indian philosophy, not the neo-vedantist reinterpretations of wishful thinkers, conveniently used to bolster the idea of an ancient enlightened civilization as the bedrock of Indian nationalism in the 19th and 20th centuries, to counter a supremacist, patronizing British imperialism. There really was a need to do away with Eurocentric 
readings of history. 
If only we had a school who studied Indian scholarly traditions with rigour and humanist sentiments, and not the humanist posings of Vedic platitudes of 'vasudhaiva kutumbakam' and 'tat tvam asi' - every religion has scores of proverbs attesting to their humanistic, universalistic and inclusivistic credentials. These are often written by the very people least likely to be inclusive in their behaviour - like my Gandhian, Arya Samaji grandfather who threw a fit when he realized that his daughter's boyfriend was not a Brahman, or my bleeding heart left-leaning IAS officer uncle who mutters 'bloody sepoy' when his uniformed valet fails to bring him his cup of coffee on time.
To use rapturous, generous proverbs, adages and mantras to blind one to reasonable skepticism is insulting to one's intelligence, especially if the person hails from IIT. 
Unfortunately, we seem to have responded to Western
 supremacist history of the world (which has been in decline for decades
 now, and modern historians are quite aware of eurocentric bias) with 
the Indian supremacist history of the world.
This
 letter is what I could do to respond to this troubling development in 
Indian academia. What will you do? Probably nothing. After all, it takes
 the ability to prioritize things which are s̶e̶l̶f̶i̶s̶h̶  practical to
 defeat thousands of other more foolishly idealistic people to get into 
an IIT, either as a professor or a student. You've got tenure, grants 
and PhD students. Thats all that matters.
Whatever,
Some Guy Whose Insolence Will Probably Vex You More Than The Subject of this Letter
Thanks for sharing this.  It’s truly dismaying to see the world’s “two greatest democracies “ — India and the US — submerged by floods of sheer idiocy. 
Matthew Kapstein 
EPHE, Paris 
 
[FYI: this is related to these other recent developments from the same institute on the same topic:
==Excerpts====
- The unicorn as a symbol of a Vedic rishi is among the four “decisive evidences” the sages of IIT Kharagpur have presented in a 2022 calendar, whose stated purpose is to rebut the “Aryan invasion myth”.
- The calendar has been produced under the auspices of the newly inaugurated Centre of Excellence for Indian Knowledge Systems at IIT Kharagpur, headed by Prof. Joy Sen.
- Even though this calendar has thrust IIT Kharagpur into the news, the so-called “Indian Knowledge Systems” already have a home in IIT Gandhinagar, and IIT Kanpur may be next in line.
Regards
Periannan Chandrasekaran