[1] Eine Mauleselstute (Vater: Pferdehengst; Mutter: Eselstute) kann nach Bhāskarakaṇṭha nur mit Kaiserschnitt gebären; MṬ I ad 13.8: aśvatarī kharastriyām aśvāj jātā vaḍavā / tasyā garbhaḥ kukṣipāṭanaṃ vinā na niryāti.
pw offers a series of entries of Sanskrit words for "Maulthier" (= "mule"):
and gives one entry for "Maulesel" (= "hinny"), namely dvijātīya. Schmidt adds "°pāraśama":
Kind regards,
WS
I also found Dhadpale’s idea convincing._______________________________________________As to whether there were āgama versions, the answer is yes, but not currently available in an Indic language, only in Chinese translation. In addition to the Madhyama-āgama passage I posted, there is a version of the Assalāyana sutta that was translated as an independent text: Fanzhi eboluoyan wen zhong zun jing, 梵志頞波羅延問種尊經 (Sutra on questions to Buddha about caste from the brahmin Ebulouyan=Assalāyana), translated by 竺曇無蘭 Zhu Tanwulan (*Dharmarakṣa, *Dharmaratna), a Central Asian monk in the late 4th c. Since it expands the discussion a bit, I translate it here. Like the Madhyama-āgama version, it omits the problematic word, unless the word was glossed instead of translated. But it adds an additional equine reproductive set:《梵志頞波羅延問種尊經》卷1:「頞波羅延言:「我種自說言勝餘種。」佛告頞波羅延:「有驢父馬母,馬[7]為生子,名是何等?」頞波羅延言:「名騾。父亦不字為騾,母亦不字為騾。」「若何以字為騾?」「我先祖呼作騾,我隨言騾。」「有馬父驢母,驢[8]為生子,若名為何等字為駏驉?父亦不字為駏驉,母亦不字為駏驉,若何知為駏驉?」「我先祖呼為駏驉,因隨言駏驉。」」(CBETA, T01, no. 71, p. 877, b29-c7)[7]〔為〕-【宋】【元】【明】。[8]為生…為=生子名是【宋】【元】【明】。Ebulouyan said, “Those of my type (= caste) say that we are better than the other types.”Buddha replied to Eboluoyan: “There is an ass father and a horse mother. The horse gives birth to a child. What is it called?”Ebulouyan said: “It’s called a mule. The father is not designated as a mule, nor is the mother designated as a mule.”[Buddha asks]: Why then do you designate it as a mule?[Ebulouyan]: “The patriarchs who preceded me called it a mule, and I follow them in saying it is a mule.”[Buddha]: “There is a horse father and an ass mother. The ass gives birth to a child. Would that be called a 駏驉 juxu (English: hinny)? [1] Neither is the father designated as a juxu, nor is the mother designated as a juxu. So how do you know it as a juxu?[Ebulouyan]: “The patriarchs who preceded me called it a juxu, so for that reason I follow them in saying it is a juxu.”—1. 駏驉 juxu “By some accounts a mythical horselike beast; other accounts give it as the offspring of a stallion and female donkey.” (CJKVE-D). In English this is called a hinny. “A hinny is a domestic equine hybrid that is the offspring of a male horse (a stallion) and a female donkey (a jenny). It is the reciprocal cross to the more common mule, which is the product of a male donkey (a jack) and a female horse (a mare). The hinny is distinctive from the mule both in physiology and temperament as a consequence of genomic imprinting.”Is there a Skt term for a hinny?DanOn Nov 21, 2020, at 10:17 PM, Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:Along the lines of Professor Dhadphale's suggestion for vekurañja as coming from Skt. dvaikulajanya, there are expressions like dvaimātura, ṣāṇmātura etc. The term dvyāmuṣyāyaṇa refers to a son with two fathers, one legal and the other biological. The sons born out of the so-called niyoga "levirate" are described with this term. The term kuṇḍa used in the passage has a meaning of "out of wedlock," but having a dual connection, suggesting something unnatural, illegal. So dvaikulajanya sounds like a very possible source. I wonder if there is a northern Sanskrit āgama version. I read from earlier messages that the non-Pali versions translated into Chinese show that this term was eliminated from the text, possibly being considered some sort of an error.Madhav M. DeshpandeProfessor Emeritus, Sanskrit and LinguisticsUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USASenior Fellow, Oxford Center for Hindu StudiesAdjunct Professor, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India[Residence: Campbell, California, USA]_______________________________________________On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:58 PM Martin Straube via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:Dear Artur, Rolf & Dan,
following a note in my files I see that M.G. Dhadphale has suggested
an etymology of the word in question in 1974. Please find the article
attached. This may or may not be helpful too.
With best wishes
Martin
--
Martin Straube
Research Fellow in Pali Lexicography
Pali Text Society
Philipps-Universität Marburg
Indologie und Tibetologie
Deutschhausstrasse 12
35032 Marburg
Germany
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)