nama'ste astu danv'ane bāhubhyā'm uta te namaḥ |
vi'jyaṁ dhana'ḥ kapardino viśa'lyo baṇa'vā(gum) uta |
ubhābyā'm uta te namo' bāhubhyāṁ tava dhanva'ne |
2) I've also listened to some recordings I have of taittirīya priests from Satara, Maharashtra, reciting.
Dear Harry Spier,according to my limited knowledge, Vājasaneyins pronounce(d) Anunāsika before semi-vowels, sibilants and h as "ṅg", represented in writing by a special sign (as in your edition): śataṃ śṛṇuyāma → "śataṅg śṛṇuyāma".Quite similar to how Germans - in the majority of cases - pronounce French nasalizations, e.g. "Kartong" for "carton"
However, the pronunciation when reciting Saṃhitā texts replaces the articulation of Anusvāra with a spoken "guṃ". So "tā guṃ haitām ..." for tāṃ haitām ..."Your symbol represents an Anusvāra sign in a particular phonetic environment.Vedicists will know better.Best,WSAm Di., 6. Okt. 2020 um 04:02 Uhr schrieb Harry Spier via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>:I pasted an image of a page in the text with the symbols but I've been informed off-list that it didn't showup so I'm attaching it.Thanks,Harry Spier_______________________________________________On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:39 PM Harry Spier <vasishtha.spier@gmail.com> wrote:First thank you to Lauren Bausch, Steven Lindquest for the information about the editions and Caley Smith who pointed me to Weber's edition on archive.org.I've just looked at the Weber's printed text . In the first line of the image from the text I've pasted below there are two symbols I don't understand and have highlighted in red. I've never seen the first. The second looks like avagraha but I'm not clear why it is where it is between long a and a.Harry Spier
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)