Dear Colleagues,

There is also a review by Dilip K. Chakrabarti on K. Rajan's book:

"K. Rajan, Early Writing System: A Journey from Graffiti to Brahmi. Madurai:
Pandya Nadu Centre for Archaeological Research, 2015, XXII + 439 pp.,
`2290 (Hardback).
DOI: 10.1177/0376983617694685"

Best regards

Murugaiyan

Le 10/09/2020 à 19:50, Sudalaimuthu Palaniappan via INDOLOGY a écrit :

In this lecture at Harvard University in 2016, Prof. Nayanjot Lahiri seems to support Rajan’s dates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6545ZZ2LCo

Regards,

Palaniappan

From: Sudalaimuthu Palaniappant <palaniappa@aol.com>
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2020 at 12:47 PM
To: "Tieken, H.J.H." <H.J.H.Tieken@hum.leidenuniv.nl>, Indology List <indology@list.indology.info>
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Brāhmī in Sri Lanka

Dear Herman,

Have you looked at the discussion of Tamil Brahmi inscriptions in K. Rajan’s “Early Writing System: A Journey from Graffiti to Brahmi”, Pandya Nadu Centre for Historical Research, Madurai, 2015? See pp. 404-405. Table 8.2 on p. 407 has six pot sherds with Tamil Brahmi dated between 4^th to 6^th century BCE.

Rajan states on p. 400, “The close observations of Damiḻi (Tamiḻ-Brāhmī) and Sri Lankan Brāhmī (Prakrit-Brāhmī) suggest they had close relations with each other in terms of paleography, probably due to geographical proximity, than the Aśokan-Brāhmī.”

Regards,

Palaniappan

From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces@list.indology.info> on behalf of Indology List <indology@list.indology.info>
Reply-To: "Tieken, H.J.H." <H.J.H.Tieken@hum.leidenuniv.nl>
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2020 at 5:17 AM
To: Indology List <indology@list.indology.info>
Subject: [INDOLOGY] Brāhmī in Sri Lanka

Dear List members,

In "Pasage to India? Anuradhapura and the Early Use of the Brahmi Script" (Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6/1 (1996), pp. 73-97) Coningham et al. conclude that the Brāhmī script was used on Sri Lanka by traders at least a century earlier than in "India" by Aśoka. His dating of the inscribed pottery shreds in question is based on the radiocarbon method. In fact, a large part of the article is dedicated to a discussion of this method. What I would like to know is if there has been a reaction to Coningham's conclusions. Salomon (1998) does not discuss them and von Hinüber (1990) and Falk (1993) could not.

With kind regards, Herman Tieken

Herman Tieken

Stationsweg 58

2515 BP Den Haag

The Netherlands

00 31 (0)70 2208127

website: hermantieken.com

_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list INDOLOGY@list.indology.info indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee) http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)