yes, we all agree - thanks to everyone!

Matthew Kapstein
Directeur d'études, émérite
Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Paris

Numata Visiting Professor of Buddhist Studies,
The University of Chicago
From: Olivelle, J P <jpo@austin.utexas.edu>
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2020 5:43 AM
To: Dan Lusthaus <prajnapti@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Kapstein <mkapstei@uchicago.edu>; indology@list.indology.info <INDOLOGY@list.indology.info>
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] a puzzling codicological term
 
Dan is probably right, but given that it occurs in Latin writing, could it be “manuscriptis” the ablative plural going with codicibus, also ablative plural.

Patrick




On Apr 5, 2020, at 5:11 AM, Dan Lusthaus via INDOLOGY <INDOLOGY@list.indology.info> wrote:

Hi Mathew,

Might it be an abbreviation for “manuscripts”?

Dan

On Apr 5, 2020, at 6:06 AM, Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:

nova literaria de msptis codicibus in Tartaria repertis

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://secure-web.cisco.com/1KV6xaJv3jQdpoOJZrXBWS1C2i50ZAgPmj27OqlcGLVfSaYLu707mCYt4GKS_lSsJUZSqG1nlwyobdUJXxfQVAhyg4GjLonAd9lpeIPU_Lbu4-Ncy2rGPzOeFatxEuVPOJqWLh8W68OpkcT0dNY0VmybglR6gyEHNHCKWXcDqgBgLui-oZVWamdk1m9qQ9U57ZfLcHRTYvc7pzeJxazWAuOESnm14AtSiWBpiC2UzJHTyhkycWQ6sw3j4LHteGrgg6iVi-bp8eiox1jtCEa4gVEakFHtDao6cK8Opaww2QSrWwRnfqxw6mCjKduYaG2G_Giyyx0VHVx1Bmg_r1ozdRRXXMSsYP_8lbXpiamc6Ld1xx5nZe237eySp4zc3K3NqEw8bisYSXnzdsOWYynixbbzlG_vnIeJecIAq1JrMGr8aSU6m8tTfUZZyfN0malu-DKN7RQDBsRSqSBj4IFosHd8U_7ah8o2_t1xZAqJygpL_whoDKD2IWXJCI7XWHDhoCYJUBnI1Y8AzVaAzP50C2BVvT_QNHay4Dc2oDt0jSEK6hD5vTkkC-sxf3oUlDOdAGD1P6XSRuHmUl7UJ0yoXAmK0XWdrdMmJHL_9udixBFI/http%3A%2F%2Flistinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
This message is from an external sender. Learn more about why this <<
matters at https://links.utexas.edu/rtyclf.                        <<