Dear Mr Steiner
I am glad to read your examples.But in ancient epics such as the Ramayana and Mahabharata,etc some uses of padma are found in masculine .But in post-paninian poetry these usages are not available.Hence in the works of Poetics as the Kavyaprakasa it has been considered a
dosa( blemish) to use a word in unpopular 
gender.There is cited an example,bhaati padmah sarovare.Hence Post-paninian poets don't use it in Masculine.
Thank you very much to give us an opportunity to exercise our mind.
Kindest regards
Girish K.Jha

On Sun, 5 Apr 2020, 18:56 Roland Steiner via INDOLOGY, <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:


> Please excuse my awkward previous stanza! This version is now
> corrected and improved by Girish K. Jha:
>
> हा हेति भूपा मुनिपुंगवाश्च
> सर्वे विलेपुः सहभृत्यलोकाः ।
> वृथैव सीते वयमागताः स्मो
> न स्पर्शनीये तव पादपद्मे ॥

Just for the indological record (without wanting to encourage or discourage anyone here):
1. padma is also used as a masculine (examples: rāghavaś cintayitvaivam upetya caraṇau pituḥ /
haṃsaḫ padmāv iva navau jagrāha nakhakesarau
; or: adya tv atitarāṃ brahman mama bhāgyaviparyayāt /
himenevāhataḫ padmas sampanno haritaẖ kṛśaḥ
). 2. The metre in the "original" stanza is a (correct) Upajāti. Now it is a (correct) Indravajrā.

RS

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)