Thanks a lot - kṣubhnāti is close, though there is also a morphological break of a different sort there, I suppose. And I think there are no other words in that gaṇa where we are dealing with an exception to nati within a word, it is all (except kṣubh-nā) about
words that don't have nati when in compound. The gaṇa as a whole appears to be a list of inexplicable exceptions to the general rules, but there is nothing quite like Korona.
I think people adapt borrowings to the constraints of their native phonology. Pāṇini would have been able to pronounce it Korona with dental, but if the rules of
Sanskrit do not allow exceptions to nati in monomorphemic stems, and only rarely in morphologically complex stems, Korona would be alien to the natural rules of Sanskrit. But perhaps with such an awful thing it's better to keep it alien!
Are there any examples of post-Pāṇinian borrowings into Sanskrit, preferably unsegmentable nominal stems, where nati was not applied according to the regular rules?
Best wishes,
John
I don't know what Pāṇini would have done, koroṇā/koronā, masculine or feminine. There are exceptions to the retroflexion rules even in single words [as क्षुभ्नादिषु च
८।४।३९. न इति वर्तते। क्षुभ्ना इत्येवम् आदिषु शब्देषु नकारस्य णकारदेशो न भवति। क्षुभ्नाति।]. In any case, importing an expression from a modern language into Sanskrit, one represents it as one hears it around. Around me here in San Jose, I don't hear the
retroflex. But either representation is fine with me. In early Marathi writings, the name of Mountstuart Elphinstone was written as मौन्त स्त्युवर्त एलफिन्स्तन. In more recent Marathi writings, I see मौंट स्टुअर्ट एलफिन्स्टन, and the more Apabhramsha version
was known as इष्टुर फाकडा. I write कॅलिफोर्निया. No retroflexion there.
Madhav M. Deshpande
Professor Emeritus, Sanskrit and Linguistics
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Senior Fellow, Oxford Center for Hindu Studies
[Residence: Campbell, California, USA]
That is, writing Sanskrit - not Hindi - we should prefer the spelling
कोरोणा. With the nirukti kora-ūna this would denote something even less
or smaller than a bud, no?
Regarding Bhāmaha, most of us would still prefer a grammatical error to
a virus infection, I guess:
एकः प्रतिदिनं श्लोकः कोरोणां हि निवारयेत् ।
सुप्तिङन्तादिदोषे ऽपि शोधनीये ऽप्रयासतः ।
इत्युक्तमवरुद्धेन स्वगृहे कविमेदिना ॥
"A stanza a day keeps the virus away --
even if there may be a grammatical error, which can easily be
corrected."
This was said by a friend of the kavis secluded in his own house.
Just my two (and a half) cents.
Best,
Christian Ferstl
Am 30.03.2020 11:02, schrieb John Lowe via INDOLOGY:
> I don't currently have access to my books and papers, but I believe
> for Panini the only optionality or exceptions to nati all involve
> morphological boundaries - either nominal compounding, or preverb-verb
> compounding.
>
> Are there any genuine examples of exceptions/optionality of nati not
> involving a morphological boundary (parallel to the many exceptions to
> ruki, like _kusuma-_)?
>
> If we could split Korona- into something like Kora-una-, then perhaps
> we could have the optionality; but then again for Panini, the tendency
> is that compounds forming names are more disposed to nati than freely
> formed compounds, so even as a compound name we would expect the
> retroflex, I think.
>
> John
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces@list.indology.info> on behalf of
> Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>
> Sent: 29 March 2020 05:22
> To: Harry Spier <vasishtha.spier@gmail.com>
> Cc: indology@list.indology.info <INDOLOGY@list.indology.info>
> Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Retroflexion and gender in viruses
>
> Dear Harry,
>
> There are similar alternating usages found in Sanskrit as well
> and authorized by Panini, for example -
>
> विभाषौषधिवनस्पतिभ्यः
> ८।४।६
>
> काशिकावृत्ति - वनम्
> इत्येव। ओषधिवाचि यत्
> पूर्वपदं वनस्पतिवाचि च
> तत्स्थान्
> निमित्तादुत्तरस्य
> वननकारस्य णकार आदेशो भवति
> विभाषा। ओषधिवाचिभ्यस्
> तावत् दूर्वावणम्,
> दूर्वावनम्। मूर्वावणम्,
> मूर्वावनम्। वनस्पतिभ्यः
> शिरीषवणम्, शिरीषवनम्।
> बदरीवणम्, बदरीवनम्।
>
> Madhav M. Deshpande
> Professor Emeritus, Sanskrit and Linguistics
> University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
> Senior Fellow, Oxford Center for Hindu Studies
>
> [Residence: Campbell, California, USA]
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:46 PM Harry Spier via INDOLOGY
> <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
>
>> Mathew Kapstein: कोरोण
>> Others कोरोना
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 7:08 AM Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY
>> <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
>>
>>> With so many mahākavi-s on this list, you will have to forgive
>>> me this silly amateurism (with Tibetan translation):
>>>
>>> कोरोणराक्षसं दृष्ट्वा
>>> रामोऽकरोच्चिन्तामेव।
>>> क्लीबमूर्खतर एष अथवा
>>> हिंसाकोविदः॥
>>>
>>>
>>
> ཀོ་རོ་ཎ་ཡི་བདུད་མཐོང་ནས།།
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ར་མ་ཎ་ཡིས་བསམ་བློ་བྱེད།།
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ཆེས་ཞན་བླུན་པོ་ཡིན་པའམ།།
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> གནོད་པའི་ཐབས་ལ་མཁས་པ་ངེས།།
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthew
>>>
>>> Matthew Kapstein
>>> Directeur d'études, émérite
>>> Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Paris
>>>
>>> Numata Visiting Professor of Buddhist Studies,
>>> The University of Chicago
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>>> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
>>> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
>>> committee)
>>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list
>>> options or unsubscribe)
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
>> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
>> committee)
>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list
>> options or unsubscribe)
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options
> or unsubscribe)