Dear list members,_______________________________________________Victor Davella wrote:Â. . .according to the standards as reported in sources spanning some 1600 years and very much still current today, it is absolutely necessary to adhere to grammatically correct Sanskrit and the rules of meter . . .It also seems that earlier there wasn't so much a concern.Of the 12 Gayatri mantras at  MaitrÄyaṇī-SaṃhitÄ 2-9-1, three of those gayatri mantras have extra syllables.ÂAnd see this post of Madhav's http://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology_list.indology.info/2015-January/040590.html which concludes: the BrÄhmaṇa texts were not bothered by deviations of meters up to two syllables".Why the change in attitude towards meter?Harry Spiertat puruá¹£Äya vidmahe mahÄdevÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan no rudraḥ pracodayÄt //
     tad gÄá¹…gaucyÄya vidmahe girisutÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan no gaurÄ« pracodayÄt //
     tat kumÄrÄya vidmahe kÄrttikeyÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan naḥ skandaḥ pracodayÄt //
     tat karÄá¹Äya vidmahe hastimukhÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan no dantÄ« pracodayÄt //
     tac caturmukhÄya vidmahe padmÄsanÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan no brahmÄ pracodayÄt //
     tat keÅ›avÄya vidmahe nÄrÄyaṇÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan no viṣṇuḥ pracodayat //
     tad bhÄskarÄya vidmahe prabhÄkarÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan no bhÄnuḥ pracodayÄt //
     tat somarÄjÄya vidmahe mahÄrÄjÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan naÅ› candraḥ pracodayÄt //
     taj jvalanÄya vidmahe vaiÅ›vÄnarÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan no vahniḥ pracodayÄt //
     tat tyajapÄya vidmahe mahÄjapÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan no dhyÄnaḥ pracodayÄt //
     tat paramÄtmÄya vidmahe vainateyÄya dhÄ«mahi /
     tan naḥ sṛṣá¹iḥ pracodayÄt //MS_2,9.1//
and see this
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)