The Sanskrit o is normally (for exceptions, see Renou G p. 23) long (so for instance in Malayalam, which has both long and short o, kokila or cakora are written  kōkila, cakōra); in lexical borrowings from ancient Greek it seems that it has normally been used for transcribing long o, cf. horā from ὥρα, paristoma from περίστρωμα.  For the short o, one finds in Varahāmihira's Horāśāstra etc. various treatments like durudhāra for δορυφορία, kemadruma for κενόδρομος, harija for ὁρίζων (other examples of Greek short o > Skrt a/ā are less relevant if it concerns the endings, cf. liptā from λεπτόν,  jāmitra from διάμετρον, kendra from κέντρον) — however, there is at least koṇa = κρόνος ; on the basis of the latter, and of the rendering of corona in the other Indian language, ko- in koroṇa seems to me acceptable.
Is there somewhere a complete listing of the Sanskrit lexical borrowings from ancient Greek?

Le 30 mars 2020 à 18:21, Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> a écrit :

This is also an interesting issue.  Among my Indian friends, and in Marathi newspapers, I see both करोना and कोरोना.  Same thing among Hindi speakers, with statements like करोना कृपा करो ना.  I have noticed this variation. Here is the news in the newspaper सकाळ from Pune:


Madhav M. Deshpande
Professor Emeritus, Sanskrit and Linguistics
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Senior Fellow, Oxford Center for Hindu Studies

[Residence: Campbell, California, USA]


On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 8:49 AM victor davella <vbd203@googlemail.com> wrote:
The other issue worth debating is the initial syllable  को, which
should be long based on the script. In many other Indian languages,
both Dravidian and Indo-Aryan, the initial vowel is short:
କରୋନାଭୂତାଣୁ  கொரோனாவைரசு ಕೊರೋನಾವೈರಸ್ കൊറോണ വൈറസ്  కరోనా వైరస్
করোনাভাইরাস.  The short vowel seems more faithful to English
pronunciation and the Latin original (corōna).  Is the spelling in
Devanāgarī based on the equivalency of o = ओ (ō).

All the Best,
Victor




On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:13 PM John Lowe via INDOLOGY
<indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot - kṣubhnāti is close, though there is also a morphological break of a different sort there, I suppose. And I think there are no other words in that gaṇa where we are dealing with an exception to nati within a word, it is all (except kṣubh-nā) about words that don't have nati when in compound. The gaṇa as a whole appears to be a list of inexplicable exceptions to the general rules, but there is nothing quite like Korona.
>
> I think people adapt borrowings to the constraints of their native phonology. Pāṇini would have been able to pronounce it Korona with dental, but if the rules of Sanskrit do not allow exceptions to nati in monomorphemic stems, and only rarely in morphologically complex stems, Korona would be alien to the natural rules of Sanskrit. But perhaps with such an awful thing it's better to keep it alien!
>
> Are there any examples of post-Pāṇinian borrowings into Sanskrit, preferably unsegmentable nominal stems, where nati was not applied according to the regular rules?
>
> Best wishes,
> John
>
> ________________________________
> From: Madhav Deshpande <mmdesh@umich.edu>
> Sent: 30 March 2020 14:12
> To: Christian Ferstl <christian.ferstl@univie.ac.at>
> Cc: John Lowe <john.lowe@orinst.ox.ac.uk>; indology <indology@list.indology.info>
> Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Retroflexion and gender in viruses
>
> I don't know what Pāṇini would have done, koroṇā/koronā, masculine or feminine.  There are exceptions to the retroflexion rules even in single words  [as क्षुभ्नादिषु च ८।४।३९. न इति वर्तते। क्षुभ्ना इत्येवम् आदिषु शब्देषु नकारस्य णकारदेशो न भवति। क्षुभ्नाति।].  In any case, importing an expression from a modern language into Sanskrit, one represents it as one hears it around.  Around me here in San Jose, I don't hear the retroflex.  But either representation is fine with me.  In early Marathi writings, the name of Mountstuart Elphinstone was written as मौन्त स्त्युवर्त एलफिन्स्तन.  In more recent Marathi writings, I see मौंट स्टुअर्ट एलफिन्स्टन, and the more Apabhramsha version was known as इष्टुर फाकडा. I write कॅलिफोर्निया.  No retroflexion there.
>
> Madhav M. Deshpande
> Professor Emeritus, Sanskrit and Linguistics
> University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
> Senior Fellow, Oxford Center for Hindu Studies
>
> [Residence: Campbell, California, USA]
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:43 AM Christian Ferstl <christian.ferstl@univie.ac.at> wrote:
>
> That is, writing Sanskrit - not Hindi -  we should prefer the spelling
> कोरोणा. With the nirukti kora-ūna this would denote something even less
> or smaller than a bud, no?
>
> Regarding Bhāmaha, most of us would still prefer a grammatical error to
> a virus infection, I guess:
>
> एकः प्रतिदिनं श्लोकः कोरोणां हि निवारयेत् ।
> सुप्तिङन्तादिदोषे ऽपि शोधनीये ऽप्रयासतः ।
> इत्युक्तमवरुद्धेन स्वगृहे कविमेदिना ॥
>
> "A stanza a day keeps the virus away --
> even if there may be a grammatical error, which can easily be
> corrected."
> This was said by a friend of the kavis secluded in his own house.
>
> Just my two (and a half) cents.
> Best,
> Christian Ferstl
>
>
> Am 30.03.2020 11:02, schrieb John Lowe via INDOLOGY:
> > I don't currently have access to my books and papers, but I believe
> > for Panini the only optionality or exceptions to nati all involve
> > morphological boundaries - either nominal compounding, or preverb-verb
> > compounding.
> >
> > Are there any genuine examples of exceptions/optionality of nati not
> > involving a morphological boundary (parallel to the many exceptions to
> > ruki, like _kusuma-_)?
> >
> > If we could split Korona- into something like Kora-una-, then perhaps
> > we could have the optionality; but then again for Panini, the tendency
> > is that compounds forming names are more disposed to nati than freely
> > formed compounds, so even as a compound name we would expect the
> > retroflex, I think.
> >
> > John
> >
> > -------------------------
> >
> > From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces@list.indology.info> on behalf of
> > Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>
> > Sent: 29 March 2020 05:22
> > To: Harry Spier <vasishtha.spier@gmail.com>
> > Cc: indology@list.indology.info <INDOLOGY@list.indology.info>
> > Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Retroflexion and gender in viruses
> >
> > Dear Harry,
> >
> >      There are similar alternating usages found in Sanskrit as well
> > and authorized by Panini, for example -
> >
> > विभाषौषधिवनस्पतिभ्यः
> > ८।४।६
> >
> > काशिकावृत्ति - वनम्
> > इत्येव। ओषधिवाचि यत्
> > पूर्वपदं वनस्पतिवाचि च
> > तत्स्थान्
> > निमित्तादुत्तरस्य
> > वननकारस्य णकार आदेशो भवति
> > विभाषा। ओषधिवाचिभ्यस्
> > तावत् दूर्वावणम्,
> > दूर्वावनम्। मूर्वावणम्,
> > मूर्वावनम्। वनस्पतिभ्यः
> > शिरीषवणम्, शिरीषवनम्।
> > बदरीवणम्, बदरीवनम्।
> >
> > Madhav M. Deshpande
> > Professor Emeritus, Sanskrit and Linguistics
> > University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
> > Senior Fellow, Oxford Center for Hindu Studies
> >
> > [Residence: Campbell, California, USA]
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:46 PM Harry Spier via INDOLOGY
> > <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
> >
> >> Mathew Kapstein: कोरोण
> >> Others कोरोना
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 7:08 AM Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY
> >> <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
> >>
> >>> With so many mahākavi-s on this list, you will have to forgive
> >>> me this silly amateurism (with Tibetan translation):
> >>>
> >>> कोरोणराक्षसं दृष्ट्वा
> >>> रामोऽकरोच्चिन्तामेव।
> >>> क्लीबमूर्खतर एष अथवा
> >>> हिंसाकोविदः॥
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > ཀོ་རོ་ཎ་ཡི་བདུད་མཐོང་ནས།།
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > ར་མ་ཎ་ཡིས་བསམ་བློ་བྱེད།།
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > ཆེས་ཞན་བླུན་པོ་ཡིན་པའམ།།
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > གནོད་པའི་ཐབས་ལ་མཁས་པ་ངེས།།
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Matthew
> >>>
> >>> Matthew Kapstein
> >>> Directeur d'études, émérite
> >>> Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Paris
> >>>
> >>> Numata Visiting Professor of Buddhist Studies,
> >>> The University of Chicago
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> INDOLOGY mailing list
> >>> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
> >>> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> >>> committee)
> >>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list
> >>> options or unsubscribe)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> INDOLOGY mailing list
> >> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
> >> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> >> committee)
> >> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list
> >> options or unsubscribe)
> > _______________________________________________
> > INDOLOGY mailing list
> > INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
> > indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> > committee)
> > http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options
> > or unsubscribe)
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistinfo.indology.info&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cchristophe.vielle%40uclouvain.be%7C0d7e38a99eeb405fffcc08d7d4c6938b%7C7ab090d4fa2e4ecfbc7c4127b4d582ec%7C0%7C0%7C637211821660336828&amp;sdata=tIxWN7BdxvAJ3a9q51%2FGLukssqt17beuhSBvWYR7C2s%3D&amp;reserved=0 (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)

–––––––––––––––––––
Christophe Vielle
Louvain-la-Neuve