While I'm loving these examples of the uselessness of Sanskrit (and see the first chapter of Fred Hardy's The Religious Culture of India: Love, Power and Wisdom for another example from Canetti's Die Blendung), I'd also like to note something Mark Allon told me some years ago, when we introduced Sanskrit at Otago. Apparently in one or other of the various international university rankings, teaching Sanskrit was one of the things which elevated a university's rank. Perhaps it was a sign the university was wealthy enough to expend resources on something useless? A sort of costly signalling. The peacock's tail of academia, as it were.

Best wishes to all

Will

On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 06:51, James Hartzell via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
As Sanskrit students at Harvard back when Ingalls was chair, the word around campus was that the Harvard Business School used Sanskrit as the example of the completely useless subject

> On 25 Mar 2020, at 18:39, Jayandra Soni via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
>
> When in the 1980s I bought, second hand, Lanman's A Sanskrit Reader, the previous owner wrote this in clear writing on p. xv below Lanman's Introductory Suggestions:
> Quit now before it's too late!
>
> Scanned and attached the first paragraph.
> I didn't follow the advice to quit.
> Jay Soni
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> <Written below Lanman's Introductory Suggestions.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)