That is:
- The 24th Chapter of the Tattvasaṃgraha: Refutation of the Mīmāṃsā doctrine of vedāpauruṣeyatva, Studies in Mīmāṃsā: Dr. Mandan Mishra Felicitation Volume, éd. R. C. Dwivedi, Delhi, 1994, pp. 117-129.
- La querelle de la Mīmāṃsā et du Bouddhisme autour de l’éternité du Véda, L’Orient des Dieux (publ. of the Université Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth) 6-7, 2006-2007, pp. 5-20.
See also by Kiyotaka Yoshimizu in Bronkhorst ed. 2007, pp. 220-224
and the book of Elstchinger - Krasser and Taber, Can the Veda speak? Dharmakīrti against Mīmāṃsā exegetics and Vedic authority, Vienna: OAW, 2012.
This is only a few references on the topic, related to PM. The apauruṣeyatva of the Veda is also something found with Bhartṛhari and Maṇḍana Miśra (Hugo David is saying that somewhere).
Le 4 nov. 2019 à 14:07, Dean Michael Anderson via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> a écrit :
_______________________________________________
Does anyone know the origin of the term and concept that the Vedas are "nitya apaurusheya", eternal and uncreated by humans?
I have heard it might have originated in Karma Mimamsa.
Also, any information about how it was conceived, discussed and debated would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dean
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistinfo.indology.info&data=02%7C01%7C%7C79f9a46c42024e8a337808d76127fe54%7C7ab090d4fa2e4ecfbc7c4127b4d582ec%7C0%7C0%7C637084696733813442&sdata=6QFdoK%2BlnZUcwKMJZAxewrSGqAHdq0EaTBYIW1dqpz0%3D&reserved=0 (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)