In addition to those mentioned by Walter Slaje, let me add these four:

Staal, J. F. 1967 Word Order in Sanskrit and Universal Grammar. Dordrecht,
Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co. (Foundations of Language, SupplementarySeries: v. 5).

Tikkanen, Bertil 1987 The Sanskrit Gerund: A Synchronic, Diachronic and
Typological Analysis. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Oriental Society (Studia Ori-
entalia: v. 62).

Gillon, Brendan S. 1996 Word order in Classical Sanskrit. Indian Linguistics: v. 57, n. 1, pp. 1–35.

Gillon, Brendan S. 1995 The autonomy of word formation: evidence from Classical Sanskrit. Indian Linguistics: v. 56, n. 1-4, pp. 15–52.

Best wishes,

Brendan Gillon

To cite but a few on prose compositions:

V. S. Apte: The Student's Guide to Sanskrit Composition. 1885. 1st Reprint Delhi 1995.

Delbrück, B.: Altindische Syntax. [Syntaktische For­schun­gen.5.] Halle 1888.

Gren-Eklund, Gunilla: A study of Nominal Sen­ten­ces in the Ol­dest Upaniṣads. [Ac­ta Universi­ta­tis Upsaliensis.3.] Upp­sa­la 1978 .

Hartman, C.G.: Emphasizing and connecting par­ticles in the thir­teen principal Upa­nishads. [Suomalaisen tiedeakatemian toi­mituksia. Sarja B,143,2.] Helsinki 1966 .

P. Hartmann, Nominale Ausdrucksformen im wissenschaftlichen Sanskrit. Heidelberg 1955 .

R. Harweg, Komposition und Katalysationstext vornehmlich im späten Sanskrit. The Hague 1964 .

H. Jacobi, Über den Stil des wissenschaftlichen Sanskrits. Indogerm. Forschungen 14 (1903): 236-251. [Kl. Schr. 6-21].

Speyer, J.S.: Vedische und Sanskrit-Syntax. [Grundriss der Indo-Arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde.1,6.] 1896. Pho­to­mechan. Nachdruck. Graz 1974.

Thommen, Eduard: Die Wortstellung im nachvedischen Alt­indischen und im Mittelindischen. Gütersloh. 1903. Nachdr. Bonn 1994 [Sarasvati ser. 11.].

Gary A. Tubb, Emery R. Boose, Scholastic Sanskrit. [Treasury of the Indic Sciences series.]. New York  2007.

Regards,

WS

Am Sa., 24. Aug. 2019 um 16:07 Uhr schrieb Christian Ferstl via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>:

Dear friends and colleagues,

I am still puzzled sometimes by the word order in prose dialogues of
early Sanskrit and Prakrit stage plays and other prose compositions. And
I am sure there are more studies on this than J.S. Speijer's Sanskrit
Syntax. Can you please refer me to some of these?

anugṛhīto' smi yuṣmākam upakāreṇa,
Christian Ferstl
University of Vienna

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)

-----------------------------
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Walter Slaje
Hermann-Löns-Str. 1
D-99425 Weimar
Deutschland

Ego ex animi mei sententia spondeo ac polliceor
studia humanitatis impigro labore culturum et provecturum
non sordidi lucri causa nec ad vanam captandam gloriam,
sed quo magis veritas propagetur et lux eius, qua salus
humani generis continetur, clarius effulgeat.
Vindobonae, die XXI. mensis Novembris MCMLXXXIII.

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)

-- 

Brendan S. Gillon                       email: brendan.gillon@mcgill.ca
Department of Linguistics
McGill University                       tel.:  001 514 398 4868 
1085, Avenue Docteur-Penfield
Montreal, Quebec                        fax.:  001 514 398 7088 
H3A 1A7  CANADA

webpage: http://webpages.mcgill.ca/staff/group3/bgillo/web/