Thursday, Oct. 25, 2018

To the International Association of Sanskrit Studies:

The extremely well-organized World Sanskrit Conference that recently took place at the University of British Columbia has given scholars of Sanskrit all over the world an opportunity to reflect on the state of our field—an opportunity that was, unfortunately, missed after the controversial events of the preceding World Sanskrit Conference in Bangkok. According to its Statute, the purpose of the International Association of Sanskrit Studies (IASS) is to “to promote, diversify, intensify and coordinate Sanskrit Studies in all the countries of the world; to maintain contacts with the organising committee of the International Congresses of Asian and North African Studies; to organise international conferences of Sanskrit studies; to promote scholarly publication of Sanskrit-based studies; to establish and foster relations with national associations of Sanskrit studies.”

We, the undersigned, believe that the IASS could do much more to “promote, diversify, intensify and coordinate Sanskrit Studies in all the countries of the world.” Taking this mission statement seriously would involve expanding the range of activities of the IASS. More importantly, it would require the IASS to strenuously avoid any actions or remarks, on the part of its members and leadership, which can do serious harm to the goal of fostering Sanskrit Studies globally, and to distance itself, as a professional organization, from such actions or remarks as already have been made. The Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft, a former institutional member of the IASS, has withdrawn its membership on precisely these grounds (see ZDMG 168.1 [2018], p. 253), and it is possible that other individual and institutional members will follow suit unless the IASS develops appropriate responses to the challenges currently facing its future.

Specifically, we would like to see the IASS do the following:

• Make all offices of the Board subject to regular election. Currently the offices of General Secretary, Treasurer, and President are not subject to a regular election. It is crucial that the members of the association are able to elect the leadership of the association on a regular basis.

• Call an election of the Board before the end of 2018. The members of the IASS must have the opportunity to decide who will represent them as office holders, and above all, as President of the Association.

• Make it absolutely clear that the IASS is a scholarly organization, and that membership in the organization, and participation in the World Sanskrit Conference, requires a scholarly engagement with Sanskrit.

• Sever any ties, official or unofficial, between the IASS and any national governments.

• Create connections between Sanskrit studies and other disciplines. The study of Sanskrit has always had the potential for close connections to the disciplines of history, philosophy, linguistics, philology, sociology, anthropology, literary studies, religious studies, gender studies, and many more. The IASS should forge connections between its members and the professional organizations that represent those disciplines.

• Form committees devoted to professional issues, publication, research, diversity, and programming, which will produce reports on a regular basis.

• Originate guidelines for the conduct of future WSC meetings and other IASS-sponsored activities that emphasise professionalism, neutrality, and independence.

It may be the case that these changes cannot be implemented without rewriting the Statute of the IASS. In that case, we request that the IASS will involve a diverse selection of scholars, drawn from outside the current Board and Consultative Committee, to assist in making the required changes, and that this process be as transparent as possible. We also sincerely request the IASS Board to respond to these suggestions in a timely manner and apprise the undersigned scholars what steps it will take and when. We consider these issues to be of utmost importance. We are concerned that if the IASS does not take appropriate steps as a matter of urgency, even more scholars will abandon the Association and its conferences, to the detriment of international Sanskrit studies.

Signed [in alphabetical order],

Andrea Acri

Michael Allen

Talia Ariav

Christèle Barois

Stefan Baums

Ana Bajzelj

Gil Ben-Herut

Jason Birch

Peter Bisschop

Adam Bowles

Jo Brill

Yigal Bronner

Whitney Cox

Daniele Cuneo

Victor D’Avella

Paul Dundas

Vincent Eltschinger

Christoph Emmrich

Iris Iran Farkhondeh

Marco Ferrante

Marco Franceschini

Emmanuel Francis

Elisa Freschi

Jonardon Ganeri

Rupert Gethin

Robert P. Goldman

Arlo Griffiths

Jürgen Hanneder

James Hartzell

Zoë Woodbury High

Alfred Hiltebeitel

Jan Houben

Jamal A. Jones

Mrinal Kaul

Agathe Keller

Birgit Kellner

Dermot Killingley

Rafal Kleczek

Jesse Knutson

Frank Köhler

Steven E. Lindquist

Jeffery D. Long

Timothy Lubin

Philipp Maas

Nabanjan Maitra

Jim Mallinson

Mark McClish

Lawrence J. McCrea

Christopher Minkowski

Jason Neelis

John Nemec

Andrew J. Nicholson

Monika Nowakowska

Heike Oberlin

Patrick Olivelle

Andrew Ollett

Lubomír Ondračka

Karin Preisendanz

Asko Parpola

Parimal Patil

Pranav Prakash

Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad

Srilata Raman

Ajay Rao

Srilata Raman

Isabelle Ratie

Madhusudan Rimal

Antonia Ruppel

Alexis Sanderson

Bihani Sarkar

Patricia Sauthoff

Martha Ann Selby

Sven Sellmer

David Shulman

Shalini Sinha

Michael Slouber

Caley Charles Smith

Frederick M. Smith

Barbora Sojkova

Hamsa Stainton

Sally Sutherland Goldman

McComas Taylor

Raffaele Torella

Davey K. Tomlinson

Audrey Truschke

Gary Tubb

Roy Tzohar

Alexander Uskokov

Christian Wedemeyer

Lidia Wojtczak

Dominik Wujastyk

Ananya Vajpeyi

Christophe Vielle

Robert Zydenbos