On 15 Sep, 2018, at 02:15, Dominik Wujastyk via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:I'm sorry to be lazy, but is it possible to summarize the scholarship on ṣ/kh alternation as stating that it is
- due in some cases to orthographic practice,
- in other cases to spoken dialectical variation, and
- in yet other cases to the orthographic recording of a spoken form?
In other words, when we see ṣ/kh in manuscripts, it's not automatically possible to tell whether we are seeing a valid recording of phonetic /ṣ/ or /kh/, or just a scribe writing kh when he sees ṣ in his exemplar or hears /ṣ/ in the dictation he's following? So a critical editor should not automatically transcribe vikhaya or dokha as viṣaya and doṣa?--Professor Dominik Wujastyk,
Singhmar Chair in Classical Indian Society and Polity,
University of Alberta, Canada.South Asia at the U of A:sas.ualberta.ca_______________________________________________On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 02:36, Jonathan Silk via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:My sincere thanks to all who helped me understand this phenomenon!Jonathan_______________________________________________On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:18 AM, Seishi Karashima via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:Dear Jonathan and colleagues,Concerning kh / ṣ, cf. Weber, Über ein zum Weissen Yajus gehöriges phonetisches Compendium, das Pratijnâsûtra 1872: 84~85; Pischel § 265; Oertel, The Syntax of Cases in the Narrative and Descriptive Prose of the Brāhmaṇas, I. The Disjunct Use of Cases 1926: 56, § 29, ex. 6; AiGr I, p. 136-137, Nachträge p. 75; Vedic Variants II § 295; Renou, Gr, p. 4; Allen, Phonetics in Ancient India 1953: 56; Bloch/Master p. 73; Handurukande 1967: xiii; Kuiper, Gopālakelicandrikā 1987: 152~154 ( “the old North indian tradition” “a common interchange arising from Rājasthānī speech”); BHSD, p. 532, śeṣita (für śekhita); Masato Kobayashi, Historical Phonology of Old Indo-Aryan Consonants, 2004: 60 (“/s./ and /kh/ are often confused in some manuscripts and in later Indo-Aryan languages”); cf. also A Dictinaray of Old Marathi (abbr. DOM) dokha < Skt. doṣa; viṣaya: DOM:/cf. vikhaya; a-namīkha : DOM: “without blinking, vigilantly" < animiṣa; agha-markhaṇa /Skt. aghamarṣṇa etc. etc.Seishi Karashima2018-09-12 23:35 GMT+09:00 Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>:Dear Jonathan,As Professor Girish Jha described, the change of ṣa to kha, except in conjuncts with ṭa-varga [ष: खष्टुमृते], is prescribed by the Prātiśākhya of the Śukla-Yajurveda and seen in the recitation of this Veda till today. This also results in variation like pāṣaṇḍa/pākhaṇḍa. Certainly, a wide-spread dialectal feature.Madhav M. DeshpandeProfessor EmeritusSanskrit and LinguisticsUniversity of Michigan[Residence: Campbell, California]On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:41 AM Arlo Griffiths via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:_______________________________________________
There is frequent reference to the same phenomenon in some of Michael Witzel's "Materials on Vedic Śākhās", his series of articles published in various journals in the 1970s-1990s.
Arlo Griffiths
From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces@list.indology.info> on behalf of Jonathan Silk via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 12:14 PM
To: jhakgirish
Cc: bvparishat@googlegroups.com; Indology
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} sha and khaDear Colleagues,
I am very interested in this equivalence, because what I remember having learned (I am not sure now whether this is the right word) that kha/ṣa "confusion" was a characteristic of Nepalese manuscripts, and that they were to be considered the same (I perhaps learned this from John Brough's lengthy review of Edgerton's Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary, if memory serves...). But now it appears that this is not a "quirk" of Nepalese scribes but an instance of a wider phonologically motivated fusion?
Curious, Jonathan Silk
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM, jhakgirish via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
Dear colleaguesSorry for the mistake due to haste.Both snushaa and snokhaa have the meaningdaughter-in-law and not grand daughter.Girish K.Jha
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Dear colleaguesThere is a sutra in Shukla yajuh praatishaakhya i.e." shah khah tumrite" It means retroflex sha is pronounced as kha except combined with the group t(tavarga).Hence in Shuklayajurveda it is pronouncedas kha. But in kashta,vishnu,etc. It is pronounced as sha.Almost all over India it is pronounced as kha in Shuklayajusha. I would like to mention that in our Mithila(North Bihar) retroflex sha is not only pronounced in Shuklayajusha but in ClassicalSanskrit too pronounced as kha and also inMaithili Language( a modern Indo-Aryan).It would not be out of the context what I would say.It has been coming from the Indo-European period.There is a Russian parallel "snokhaa" which resembles Sanskrit "snushaa" but both have the same meaning i.e.grand daughter.RegardsGirish K.JhaRetd. Univ.ProfessorDept of SanskritPatna UniversityPatna:India 800005(Residence-Kolkata:India)Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.-------- Original message --------From: V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian@gmail.com> Date: 9/12/18 7:06 AM (GMT+05:30) To: BHARATIYA VIDVAT <bvparishat@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: पुरुषसूक्तम् -- शुक्ल यजुर्वेद On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:23 AM Shashi Joshi <shashikgp@gmail.com> wrote:Interestingly this same ष ---> ख pronunciation transition is seen in Rajasthan. My grandfather would say words likeखडयन्त्र (षड्यन्त्र )पुख्य (पुष्य नक्षत्र)सुखेण (सुषेण in Hanuman Chalisa)लक्ष्मी becoming लकुमी is common in Kannada poetry. ಏನು ಧನ್ಯಳೋ ಲಕುಮಿSubmitted by shreekant.mishrikoti on Tue, 06/01/2009 - 03:19(ರಾಗ ತೋಡಿ ಅಟತಾಳ)ಏನು ಧನ್ಯಳೋ ಲಕುಮಿಎಂಥ ಮಾನ್ಯಳೋಸಾನುರಾಗದಿಂದ ಹರಿಯತಾನೆ ಸೇವೆ ಮಾಡುತಿಹಳೋ ||ಪ|-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयवि��-------- Original message --------From: jhakgirish <jhakgirish@gmail.com>Date: 9/12/18 10:16 AM (GMT+05:30)To: Indology <indology@list.indology.info>, bvparishat@googlegroups.comSubject: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} sha and kha
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
--
J. Silk
Leiden University
Leiden University Institute for Area Studies, LIASMatthias de Vrieshof 3, Room 0.05b2311 BZ Leiden
The Netherlands
copies of my publications may be found at
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
--J. Silk
Leiden UniversityLeiden University Institute for Area Studies, LIASMatthias de Vrieshof 3, Room 0.05b2311 BZ LeidenThe Netherlandscopies of my publications may be found at
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)