_______________________________________________I join Rich in expressing this sentiment. In acknowledging one serious aberration, let us not forget the many, many excellent panels at the WSC, some of which I attended and profited from. And they were also organized by Adheesh and his team, for which we should be thankful. Let us be large-hearted, as we, quite appropriately, defend the academy and scholarship against political and ideological intrusions and assaults.
Patrick
On Aug 27, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Richard G Salomon via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
_______________________________________________Dear colleagues,
I would like to endorse John Nemec's comments in appreciation of Adheesh Sathaye's efforts on behalf of the recent WSC conference and its aftermath. He, along with Mandakranta Bose and many others, did an excellent job, and it seems to me that we should be thanking rather than criticizing him/them. As organizer he was inevitably caught in the crossfire, but has managed the matter in as tactful and diplomatic a manner as possible.
It is all too easy to criticize a person who lands in such a situation, but it is usually best to resist the temptation.
Rich Salomon
On 8/25/2018 1:14 PM, Audrey Truschke via INDOLOGY wrote:
Dear All,
I have no complaints regarding the number of hours that Dr. Sathaye put into organizing the WSC. I have an objection to basically apologizing to those who disrupted conference proceedings by spewing misogyny, casteism, and other vile sentiments. I also object to watering down an earlier commitment to professionalism, scholarly discourse, and integrity.
I think there’s a pretty big problem with giving slack on bowing to hateful Hindutva pressures and behaviors. Unsurprisingly, this slack comes at the expense of the most disadvantaged within our discipline already, such as women and Dalits. When will we see more folks standing up for those that lack power, rather than those who have it and are “exhausted” by exercising it?
I think we are better off naming - clearly and without equivocation - the poisonous trend of accommodation and compromise with hate that is sweeping up many in our discipline. It’s likely a losing battle, but I’ll fight my corner all the same. I invite others to join me.
Audrey TruschkeAssistant ProfessorDepartment of HistoryRutgers University-NewarkDear Colleagues, Dear Audrey Truschke,
I did attend the WSC for a short time but not the offending incident, which sounds horrible. I appreciate some of what Adheesh said in his emails, and yet imagine I might not have said all of what he said.
But, having organized an academic event only 1/100th the size and complexity of the WSC 2018, and having found that administrative task hefty enough and unnerving enough to be able perhaps just to begin to imagine the sheer work Adheesh put into the conference (from which many scholars benefitted), I know we owe him a debt of gratitude for his service. I also think we can all be quite confident that he came into this project and service with the best of intentions. And I am quite certain he has learned the unfortunate lesson that "all good deeds go unpunished."
In a word: We are all human, and Adheesh must be exhausted by the WSC. He was hardly the perpetuator of the offending acts. I hope we can all cut him some slack. Adheesh, thank you for all the work you did for Indology.
John
Dear All,
This is a formal retraction of Dr. Sathaye’s earlier note. It’s shameful. It apologizes to the offenders, not the maligned. It deflects attention from the real issues. It is part of the problem identified by Dr. Vajpeyi. If anyone needed further proof of how much hateful Hindutva sentiments and pressures are overtaking our discipline, look no further.
It seems to me that the World Sanskrit Conference is a lost cause at this point. The bigger issue, however, is seeing the moral and ethical compromises being made by Indologists in emails such as this. I’m horrified and, frankly, embarrassed to see such things.
For those interested in ongoing coverage of the event that sparked what’s become a show of horrors and how our discipline looks to the outside world - https://www.firstpost.com/life/world-sanskrit-conference-shows-that-sanskritic-scholarship-in-india-remains-afraid-of-gender-and-caste-4895051.html
Audrey
Audrey TruschkeAssistant ProfessorDepartment of HistoryRutgers University-NewarkDear Colleagues:
I would like to make a few points of clarification regarding my previous post on the WSC Forum on Gender and Caste: (see http://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology_list.indology.info/2018-August/142744.html). I write again only in my capacity as the organizer of the Gender and Caste Forum. I do *not* speak on behalf of the WSC Organizing Committee, nor the IASS, but just as myself.
1.There have been requests that the WSC should release footage of the event. However,(a) I can clarify that the WSC team did not record any events during the conference, except those of the inaugural day. So unfortunately, we don’t have any tape to release.(b) Many of us noticed a fellow with a tripod in the front row recording the event. This person was not a member of our team, nor a registered WSC delegate, and is unknown to me. Other spectators may also have taken videos and uploaded them to the internet.
2. In my previous post, I had used the word ‘hooliganistic’ to describe the ways of speaking that I witnessed by some people in the audience. After further self-reflection, and after reading the objections against it, I agree that this word was inappropriate to use, and that it contains accusatory overtones that I did not intend to make. I regret using this extreme term to describe the shouting that I witnessed, instead of a more straightforward word. I also would like to note that in my recollection, several scholars spoke their remarks that evening without shouting, while others waited patiently for their turn to speak. I humbly ask those who may have felt wrongfully accused by my improper use of this word to allow for its retraction.
Other statements of mine might also sound like blanket accusations against large parts of the audience. However, I would like to clarify that this was not my intention. My main objective in writing my response was to acknowledge, and apologize for, my own failure as the organizer in preventing and mediating the conflicts that occurred at the Forum. I did not intend to make public pronouncements about who shouted or why they did so.
To be clear: as the organizer of the Forum, and also as the Lead Organizer of the WSC, I abstain from making public accusations against any specific individuals or groups.
3. I would like to clarify that my apology extends also to everyone who was negatively impacted by the event—including those in the audience, who, after all, were also our invited guests to Vancouver. I realize that I did not state this explicitly in my previous post, so please allow me do so here:
I apologize for any negative impact felt by the audience, as well as the speakers, due to the mismanaged Forum on Gender and Caste at the 17th WSC. Our Committee did not wish to create distress for any of our respected guests, on stage or in the audience, and I should have worked harder to ensure that such a situation did not occur.
Many people have now written about the details of what happened. I appreciate hearing your points of view, and I thank you all for taking the time to offer your personal perspectives on what happened. I don’t dispute your accounts, and I respect your right to express them. All of the accounts of the event—including Dr. Vajpeyi’s—point to serious problems in its initial planning, management, facilitation, and communication that produced a hostile environment. These are areas that I was responsible for, as the organizer. I accept your criticism, I will take these difficult lessons to heart, and will apply them in a positive way toward the future.
4. Clarification of funding:(a) The 17th WSC did not receive any monetary support from the Government of India. The travel of the Nepathya troupe was supported by ICCR and the inaugural banquet was hosted by the Hon. Minister, HRD, Shri Prakash Javadekar.(b) Funding for the Gender/Caste Forum was sought from local sources *after* I had proposed the idea and it had been approved by the WSC Organizing Committee. Registration fees were not used to fund the event, and our donors did not make any demands on its content or format.
I hope this note might clarify some matters and ease some concerns. I hesitate to write on this matter again in public, but I will be happy to communicate with anyone further privately, if desired. And I do hope that, in all other aspects, the 17th WSC was an inspiring, congenial, and productive gathering for all 500+ delegates who visited us in Vancouver. We had tried our best to make it so.
With all best wishes,
—Adheesh SathayeUniversity of British Columbia
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list INDOLOGY@list.indology.info indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee) http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)