On Tue 14 Aug, 2018, 8:01 AM Brendan via INDOLOGY, <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
Alas Bochenski's discussion (art. 53 sec. F) consists of 9 lines, 3 lines of which are a schema for the three conditions of the Trairuupya, are translations of eva, respectively, as "wholly", "only" and "never".

On `eva', see the following:
Kajiyama, Y. 1973 Three kinds of affirmation and two kinds of negation in
Buddhist philosophy. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens: v. 17,
pp. 161 – 175.
Gillon, Brendan and Richard Hayes 1982 The role of the particle eva in (log-
ical) quantification in Sanskrit. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens:
v. 26, pp. 195 – 203.
Ganeri, Jonardon Dharmakı̄rti’s semantics for the particle eva. In: Studies in the Bud-
dhist Epistemological Tradition Proceedings of the Third International
Dharmakı̄rti Conference, Hiroshima, 11-16 November, 1997 (Verlag
der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, edited Shoryu
Katsura, 1999), pp. 101–116.

Gillon, Brendan Another look at the Sanskrit particle eva. In: Studies in the Bud-
dhist Epistemological Tradition Proceedings of the Third International
Dharmakı̄rti Conference, Hiroshima, 11-16 November, 1997 (Verlag
der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, edited Shoryu
Katsura, 1999), pp. 117–130.

An appendix to the last article provides a taxonomy of the various usages found in the Svaarthaanumaana section up to verse 38 of Dharmakı̄rti's Pramaa.navaarttika. I have found that taxonomy to be borne out in various readings I have done since then. (There are usages which were to me, at least, unclassifiable.)

Brendan Gillon

On 2018-08-13 03:51 PM, Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY wrote:
Dear Birgit,

Betty Hermann's The Significance of Prefixes in Sanskrit Philosophical Terminology

though not quite what you are looking for,

may be of interest in this context nevertheless.

And, if I recall correctly, Bochenski, in his History of Formal Logic, has a useful discussion of the logical use of eva.

best,

Matthew

Matthew T. Kapstein

EPHE, Paris

The University of Chicago

From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces@list.indology.info> on behalf of Eric Gurevitch via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 9:40:29 PM
To: Tieken, H.J.H.
Cc: indology@list.indology.info
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Resources for commentarial interpretations of particles

Jan Gonda once published a 15 page article about the Sanskrit particle api entitled "The Sanskrit Particle api.”

I think Luther Obrock has a useful flow chart laying out its usage too.

All the best,

Eric

On Aug 13, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Tieken, H.J.H. via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:

How can I forget. I myself wrote an article on kira/kiri as well: “Two Peculiar Usages of the Particle kira/kiri in Apabhraṃśa”. Sambodhi 32 (2009), 33-36.
In this article I refer to Van Daalen's article mentioned in my previous mail, published in IIJ XXX (1988), pp, 111-137 and to I. Ickler, Die vedische Partikel kila, published in Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachfirschung 90 (1976), pp. 50-86.

Herman Tieken
Stationsweg 58
2515 BP Den Haag
The Netherlands
00 31 (0)70 2208127
website: hermantieken.com

________________________________________
Van: INDOLOGY [indology-bounces@list.indology.info] namens Brendan via INDOLOGY [indology@list.indology.info]
Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2018 21:13
Aan: indology@list.indology.info
Onderwerp: Re: [INDOLOGY] Resources for commentarial interpretations of particles

The article by Emeneau, entitled "Sanskrit syntactic particles ---
khalu, khila and nuunam", appeared, if I recall correctly, in JOAS in 1969.

I don't recall where Joel's article appeared.

Brendan Gillon

On 2018-08-13 02:37 PM, Olivelle, J P via INDOLOGY wrote:

Hi Birgit:

Off the top of my head, there is the wonderful article on “iva” by Joel Brereton, and I think on “khila” by Emeneau.

Patrick

On Aug 13, 2018, at 1:33 PM, Birgit Kellner via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:

Dear colleagues,

I was wondering whether any of you know of resources to recommend especially to students on commentarial interpretations of particles, especially api, ca, tu, eva, which function as connectives and logical operators. I am particularly interested in presentations of the range of options that are available from vyākaraṇa analysis, and discussions of the metalanguage used (e.g. avadhāraṇa, samuccaya, sambhāvanā, atiśaya ...).

There is much material tucked away in footnotes to various publications, of course, there are helpful classics like Speijer's Sanskrit Syntax, there are some remarks in introductory textbooks and grammar works, and some efforts were made towards compiling patterns of commentarial language inTubb & Bose's "Scholastic Sanskrit" and in Angot's recent "Sanskrit commentarial", and there are articles dealing with specific particles and their logical implications (esp. eva), but I have not come across attempts to offer more comprehensive inventories of the terms śāstric commentators use in interpreting particles.

Pointers would be much appreciated; I'll collect responses and post a list later.

With best regards,

Birgit kellner

--
----
Prof. Dr. Birgit Kellner
Director
Institute for the Cultural and Intellectual History of Asia
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Hollandstrasse 11-13/2
A-1020 Vienna
Austria
Phone: +43-(0)1-51581-6420
Fax: +43-(0)1-51581-6410
http://ikga.oeaw.ac.at

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)

--

Brendan S. Gillon                       email: brendan.gillon@mcgill.ca
Department of Linguistics
McGill University                       tel.: 001 514 398 4868
1085, Avenue Docteur-Penfield
Montreal, Quebec                        fax.: 001 514 398 7088
H3A 1A7 CANADA

webpage: http://webpages.mcgill.ca/staff/group3/bgillo/web/

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
-- 

Brendan S. Gillon                       email: brendan.gillon@mcgill.ca
Department of Linguistics
McGill University                       tel.:  001 514 398 4868 
1085, Avenue Docteur-Penfield
Montreal, Quebec                        fax.:  001 514 398 7088 
H3A 1A7  CANADA

webpage: http://webpages.mcgill.ca/staff/group3/bgillo/web/
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)