Thanks, Patrick.  There was a discussion elsewhere about this word apavyaya.  In Marathi, the word means waste of money or improper use of money or time.  It also occurs in this meaning in some other Indian languages.  The Śaṅkara-Digvijaya usage seems to have a completely different meaning.  In the sense of waste of or improper use of money or time, this seems to be a relatively new coinage.  It does appear in Molseworth's Marathi-English Dictionary prepared around 1850, but does not occur in Tulpule-Feldhaus Dictionary of Old Marathi.  So, apavyaya in this sense arose sometime during the early modern period.  The inclusion of this word in MW and Apte in this meaning surprises me, but they don't provide any classical attestations.

Madhav

Madhav M. Deshpande
Professor Emeritus
Sanskrit and Linguistics
University of Michigan
[Residence: Campbell, California]


On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 12:30 PM Olivelle, J P <jpo@austin.utexas.edu> wrote:
Hi Madhav:

I have the volume it is on p. 4613 of Vol 9, pt. 3 (in the old counting) It gives for the substantive:  A. prodigality; B extravagant expenditure, lavishness (first from MW and second from Apte). There is also the adj: not declining, immutable, and cites ŚaṅkaDigVi 6.58. 

Patrick



On Aug 11, 2018, at 2:06 PM, Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:

I will appreciate if someone could check the attestations for the word अपव्यय in the recent volumes of the Deccan College dictionary.  Thanks.  

Madhav M. Deshpande
Professor Emeritus
Sanskrit and Linguistics
University of Michigan
[Residence: Campbell, California]


On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 11:18 AM Gérard Huet via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
The last published volume is indeed vol. 30, ending in lexeme apramātvānadhikaraṇatva. About 6% of the way.
Reaching artha would mean 8% completion, i.e. a 1/3 increase.
GH

> Le 9 août 2018 à 05:30, Peter Wyzlic via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> a écrit :
>
>
>
>> Am 09.08.2018 um 00:31 schrieb David and Nancy Reigle via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>:
>>
>> No, the last fascicle of vol. 9, published in 2011, goes to api.
>
> There are actually more volumes published. After vol. 9 the editors changed the numbering to 28 (published 2012). The last volume I am aware of came out 2014 as vol. 30. Unfortunately, I don‘t have them at hand right now so I am not able to say what the last lemma is about.
>
> All the best
>
> Peter Wyzlic
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)


_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)