I have a longer (42 pp.) article entitled "On ancient Indian ox-carts, biers, beds and thrones: À propos of Sanskrit śakaṭī- / śakaṭa- and its etymology" forthcoming shortly in: Indology's pulse: Arts in context (Doris M. Srinivasan Festschrift), edited by Corinna Wessels-Mevissen and Gerd J. R. Mevissen, New Delhi: Aryan Books International. There I discuss in detail the contexts in which the word śakaṭa- occurs in Vedic and epic (and selectively other Sanskrit)  literature. The following extract concerns the Śulvasūtras:

Context XV: Carts and the shapes of brickbuilt

fire altars (citi). The Kātyāyana-Śulvasūtra

mentions a citi shaped like the triangular-shaped

‘mouth’ of a cart (1,18 śakaṭamukhasya caivam).

This is synonymous with the praüga-citis used in

rites of sorcery which are described in Āpastamba-Śulvasūtra

(12,4 praügaṃ cinvīta bhrātṛvyavān iti

vijñāyate ...), cf. the commentaries of Kapardisvāmin

(ed. Srinivasachar & Narasimhachar 1931: 202):

praügaḥ śakaṭapūrvabhāgaḥ, and Sundararāja (ibid.:

205): praügaṃ śakaṭasya mukhaṃ trikoṇaṃ tadvac

cīyata iti praügacit. In addition, the Āpastamba-Śulvasūtra

also describes a rhombus-shaped twofaced

praüga-citi for annihilating existing enemies

and those yet to be born (12,7 ubhayataḥpraügaṃ

cinvīta yaḥ kāmayeta prajātān bhrātṛvyān nudeya

pratijaniṣyamāṇān iti vijñāyate): it looks like two

carts/fore-parts of carts (joined together), with

their fronts facing different directions (12,8 yathā

vimukhe śakaṭe), cf. the commentaries of Karavinda

(ibid.: 208): vimukhe nānāmukhe śakaṭe yathā pṛṣṭhe

saṃhite tiṣṭhete tādṛgākārām ubhayatra praügaṃ

tathā cinvītety arthaḥ, and Sundararāja (ibid.: 209):

vimukhe viparyastamukhe prākpaścānmukhe yathā

śakaṭabhāge tādṛg eṣo ’gnir bhavati.


With best regards,


On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Toke Lindegaard Knudsen via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
Dear Matthew,

Thanks. It’s certainly possible that the author of my source misunderstood the opinion he paraphrases and took “cart-shaped” to refer to the entire earth, whereas only a portion of the earth was intended.

In Hindu cosmography, Jambudvīpa refers to a circular continent surrounded by annular oceans and continents. Since the author rejects that the earth is cart-shaped, it’s possibly a refutation of a Buddhist idea.

The triangular or trapezoidal shape in the Buddhist sources you refer to agrees with the drawing in the Śilpa-prakāśa manuscript. I’m not sure where Bose got “quadrangular, with a long triangular projection on one side” from.

This begs the question, of course, of whether carts in ancient India were generally trapezoidal-shaped?

Best wishes,
Toke



> On Apr 5, 2018, at 13:15, Matthew Kapstein <mkapstei@uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear Toke.
>
> I've never seen this referring to "the earth." But  in Buddhist sources frequently to the triangular or trapezoidal shape attributed to Jambudvīpa, the southern continent.
>
> best,
> Matthew
>
> Matthew Kapstein
> EPHE
>
> Get Outlook for Android
>
> From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces@list.indology.info> on behalf of Toke Lindegaard Knudsen via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>
> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 12:53:40 PM
> To: Indology
> Subject: [INDOLOGY] Cart-shaped, śakaṭākāra
>
> Hi all,
>
> In a passage of interest to me, the author attributes to “some” the idea that the earth resembles or is shaped like a cart (bhuvam … śakaṭākārām). I’m trying to understand (1) what precisely is understood by “cart-shaped” (śakaṭākāra or śakaṭākṛti) and (2) how the earth can have the shape of a cart.
>
> In Phanindra Nath Bose’s _Principles of Indian Silpasastra_ from 1926, śakaṭākṛti is explained (p. 75) as, “cart-shaped or quadrangular, with a long triangular projection on one side.”
>
> In the Śilpa-prakāśa (Alice Boner and Sadāśiva Rath Śarmā’s edition, translation, and study, second revised edition, 2005), a list of shapes of building sites is given. One such shape is śakaṭākṛti (verse 1.39), which is translated as “a tapering bullock-cart (śakaṭākṛti kuñcita).” The book contains facsimiles of the palm leaf pages of a manuscript, which includes drawings to illustrate the building-site shapes (plate I). The drawing of the cart-shaped building site doesn’t look like what Bose describes (see above), but rather looks like an isosceles trapezoid.
>
> I also found that “cart-shaped” is included in a list of possible shapes of the sacred śālagrāma stones. This particular shape is undesirable.
>
> Would any of you have any clues or thoughts on which geometrical figure (or figures) “cart-shaped” refers to? Or further references in this regard?
>
> Best wishes,
> Toke
>
> -----
> Toke Lindegaard Knudsen, Ph.D.
>
> Associate Professor and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow
> Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies
> University of Copenhagen
>
> <toke.knudsen@hum.ku.dk>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
> indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)



--