Most likely this is an error. The two electronic versions seem to be related.

Titus:

Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa (Mādhyandina recension)
Books 1-11, 13-14:
Data entry under the guidance of W.P. Lehmann (Austin, Texas) by H.S. Ananthanarayana (Hyderabad); adaptation by J.R. Gardner (Iowa) Further information
Gretil:

Satapatha-Brahmana, Madhyamdina recension (input by John Robert Gardner)

Elliot

On 02 Sep  2017, at 13:11, Herman Tull via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:

I recently had an enquiry about a short passage from the Shatapatha Brahmana.  The passage in question is 7.4.1.1. 

Both Titus and Gretil transliterate as follows:

ātmano vā etamadhijanayati yādṛśādva jāyate 

The "va" following the "yādṛśād" is curious, and the several printed editions (Weber, etc) I checked (and asked colleagues to check...thanks to Steven Lindquist and Fred Smith) have "vai"

Is there a convention I am missing, or is this an error?

Thanks

Herman Tull


_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)