I am resending an earlier message, which apparently did not reach indology list because google could not deliver it to the address of Nagaraj. Christophe has already given the reference, but here are more details and how you can download pdf(s):On the anācāras of the Kerala Brahmins, see the appendices to my wife Marjatta Parpola's book "Kerala Brahmins in transition: A study of a Nampūtiri family" (Studia Orientalia 91), Helsinki: The Finnish Oriental Society, xii, 436 pp. In the appendices (pp. 403-425) I reproduce Śāṅkarasmṛti 1,12,4 in Sanskrit and its Malayalam commentary with an annotated English translation of the former. My wife then discusses Logan's, Fawcett's and S. Venkitasubramonia Iyer's discussions of these rules, and finally I reproduce Gundert's Keral'-achara-sancshepam.Pdf(s) of the book('s chapters) can be downloaded freely from--On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Christophe Vielle via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:When I wrote in my second post:(without having checked what Kane — or possibly David — says thereabout) I made this conjecture on the sole basis of Burnell's statement ( https://archive.org/stream/ordIt is possible that the portion listing the sixty four anācāras and corresponding to adhyāya 12, pāda 4 of the Laghudharmaprakāśikā, was separately known as the Anācāra-nirṇayainancesofmanu00manu#page/n55/ ) pointed out by Madhav:mode/2up "And in Malabar, Cochin and Travancore this [= the fact that "even among South Indian Brahmans numberless usual practices are opposed to the Sanskrit law"] is so much the case, that a small manual called the Anācāranirṇaya has been composed to enumerate them — fn: This tract is attributed to Çaṅkara of course (...)"Since no Kerala manuscript appears to bear this title.Now in checking dharma texts entitled ācāraḥ, ācārasaṅgrahaḥ, keralācārasaṅgrahaḥ, found in catalogues, I came across a short tract entitled Ācāranirṇaya or Keralācāranirṇaya ascribed to Śaṅkarācarya (several MSS. in the KUML, apparently described in the Descr. Cat. Curator's Office Library as the no. 371B, i.e. in vol. 2 1938, unfortunately not at hand) which must correspond to Burnell's reference and deserves to be more closely regarding the Kerala… anācāras.Best wishes,CPS: correct the typo in my very first post (already giving the references usefully repeated by Parpola and Olivelle): "the Laghudharmaprakāśikā attributed to one Śaṅkara [not Śāṅkara], also known as Śāṅkarasmṛti."Le 7 juin 2017 à 12:59, Olivelle, J P via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> a écrit :______________________________Dear Madhav:
Don Davis is the person to consult on this. There are several texts written about “anācāra” — which is, contrary to what it seems, is actually practices that are proper but goes against the ācāra of the smṛtis and are OK in Kerala. The CESMEO published a text called Śāṅkarasmṛti alias Laghudharmaprakāśikā, edited and translated by N. P. Unni in 2003. In Ch. 12 of that work there is a list of 64 anācāras.
Patrick
On Jun 6, 2017, at 6:06 PM, Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
I found an interesting reference in A. C. Burnell's The Ordinances of Manu, (Intro. p. xxxvii) to a work titled Anācāranirṇaya composed in Kerala to discuss "deviations" from Brahmanical Dharmaśāstras. According the footnote on this page, this work was evidently attributed to Śaṅkara. This may be the source of Śāmaśāstrī Draviḍa Dvivedi using the expression ācāryaśāpadagdha to refer to these regions. Here is the passage from Burnell:
I wonder if anyone has come across this work titled Anācāranirṇaya. Any help?
Madhav DeshpandeAnn Arbor, Michigan, USA______________________________
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Madhav Deshpande <mmdesh@umich.edu> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
In one of the curious passages of the Vedavicāra (written by Śāmaśāstrī Draviḍa Dvivedī) that I am editing, the author says that though the Gurjara's are included among Drāviḍas, other Drāviḍas do not have any educational, ritual or marriage relations with them, because like the Gauḍadeśa, there is too much anācāra "immoral behavior" among them, and like the Brahmins of Kerala, they were cursed by an Ācārya, and therefore, other Drāviḍas do not have any relations with them. Here is the passage from the text:
यथा गुर्जराणां द्राविडान्तःपातिनामपि द्राविडैः सह भोजनादिसंव्यवहारादिकं नास्ति, तथैवाध्ययनादिकमपीति ज्ञेयम् । कुतो गुर्जराणां संव्यवहाराभाव इति चेदुच्यते । गौडदेशवद्गुर्जरदेशेऽप्यनाचारबाहुल्यात् तेषामाचार्यशापदग्धत्वात्केरलदेशीयब्राह्मणादिवत्संव्यव हाराभाव इति संक्षेपः ।
If anyone has a clue as to what this Ācāryaśāpa refers to, it would help me make better sense of this passage. Similarly, it is not clear what anācārabāhulya he is referring to in the Gauḍa/Gurjara and Kerala regions. Any suggestions will be helpful. Best,
Madhav DeshpandeAnn Arbor, Michigan, USA
_________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)–––––––––––––––––––Louvain-la-Neuve
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)Asko Parpola, aparpola@gmail.com