daiva is the result of past actions (pūrva
karman). Past actions are ultimately past efforts (pauruṣa).
As efforts, past and present efforts do not differ in their
nature. As they do not differ, it is possible to conquer the
results of past actions by stronger counteractive measures (para-pauruṣa)
of today. Therefore, past karma can be overcome by human effort.
It is not inescapable. It cannot be predicted by daivajñas as
they cannot know the efforts a human might or might not be
willing to take. For, it is a matter of free will, and that is
also a matter where the whole topic becomes really interesting.
The opinion of the author of the MU seems to differ only by degree
from the general consensus of Indian astrologers, then: he claims
that
all effects of past action may be counteracted by
present action; they say that
some effects (
adṛḍha-karman)
may be so counteracted, while others (
dṛḍha-karman) are too
powerful and therefore must take effect. Both operate within a
framework of karma theory.
In the case of a person who is not willing to make any great
effort to change his 'fate', then, I suppose our author would
agree that the person's actions from previous lives will largely
determine his present one. The question that I am really after is
this: would he then accept the celestial mechanics studied and
interpreted by astrologers as accurately reflecting such
karma-phala?
But perhaps that is not a topic that comes up in the MU.
Best wishes,
Martin