Thanks, Alex.  Endo's article is cast as a response to Bader, with whom he specifically takes issue on some points. 

--

Professor Dominik Wujastyk
​,​

Singhmar Chair in Classical Indian Society and Polity
​,​

University of Alberta, Canada
​.​

South Asia at the U of A:
 
​sas.ualberta.ca​
​​


On 21 December 2016 at 11:39, Alex Watson <alex.watson@ashoka.edu.in> wrote:
From: Dominik Wujastyk <wujastyk@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kapstein <mkapstei@uchicago.edu>
Cc: Indology List <indology@list.indology.info>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:25:00 -0700
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] khyā/khyāti

On 20 December 2016 at 04:41, Matthew Kapstein <mkapstei@uchicago.edu> wrote:
​...​


Me too.  ​I would also be interested in any studies of the presumably related term prasaṅkhyāna (= "sattvapuruṣānyatākhyāti" PYŚ) that is a keyword in the Pātañjalayogaśāstra. ​ I am aware of 

Endo, K. Mayeda, S.; Matsunami, Y.; Tokunaga, M. & Marui, H. (Eds.) "Prasaṃkhyāna in the Yogabhāṣya" in The Way to Liberation: Indological Studies in Japan, Manohar Publishers & Distributors, 2000, 75-89. 

​Best,
Dominik​
 
Dear Dominik

See pp. 74–80 of Jonathan Bader's Meditation in Śaṅkara's Vedānta.  There he
- contrasts prasaṅkhyāna with the almost synonymous term pratisaṅkhyāna (famously the topic of the third chapter of Śaṅkara's Upadeśasāhasrī)
and
- discusses the use of the term prasaṃkhyāna in classical Yoga, Advaita Vedānta and Kālidāsa.

khyāti in sattvapuruṣānyatākhyāti of course has a different sense from that which it has in the khyātivāda that Matthew was speaking of: erroneous cognition in the latter, correct cognition/discernment in the former.

Best
Alex
--
Alex Watson
Professor of Indian Philosophy
Ashoka University

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)