Dear Colleagues,

It would also be useful to look at ChU 1.1 on the udgītha and om and the identification of the udgītha/om as the rasa of all rasas.

All the best,

Hans Henrich Hock


On 17 Oct 2016, at 10:09, Nityanand Misra <nmisra@gmail.com> wrote:



On 17 October 2016 at 13:42, Roland Steiner <steiner@staff.uni-marburg.de> wrote:

Citation 2: [L=175517rasa N. of the sacred syllable, “Om,” S3a1n3khGr2.

Where in शाङ्खायन-गृह्य-सूत्र is the word ‘rasa’ used for Om? I searched in the digital version of Bloomfield’s Concordance but did not find it.

Compare the following entry in Otto Böhtlingk's "Sanskrit-Wörterbuch in kürzerer Fassung", s.v. rasa [5-173] 1)  y) "Bez. der heiligen Silbe om Śāṅkh. Gṛhy. 2,13". (refers to the edition by Hermann Oldenberg published in Albrecht Weber's "Indische Studien" vol. 15, 1878; for a digital version, see https://archive.org/details/indischestudien00unkngoog ; you will find the relevant textual passage on p. 62: vāruṇya 'rcā rasena vā; German translation: p. 63: "mit einem Varuṇaverse oder dem Saft(-spruch Om)"; note: p. 141: "[...] vedānāṃ rasabhūtena praṇavena").


Thanks a lot for this. I had seen the meanings of rasa listed in Böhtlingk and Roth Grosses Petersburger Wörterbuch (where I did not find any reference to Śāṅkhāyana Gṛhya Sūtra), but not in Böhtlingk Sanskrit-Wörterbuch in kürzerer Fassung

It is useful to know that it is Nārāyaṇa’s (N.) commentary that interprets rasa as praṇava. Is a digital edition of this commentary available? My search on archive, scribd, and DLI drew a blank.
 
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)