Dear list members,

I too thought I would keep quite. As a moral philosopher who deals with these kinds of issues, I have too much to say so I thought to say nothing. But I have been amazed that this thread has continued in part due to all the objections to the original post (which probably would have peacefully receded into the background had it not hit a nerve). I have been struck by the following:

(1) How relevant one believes sexual harassment is to Indology has to do with how worried one is about encountering this in one's research as an Indologist. The issue is not merely about whether one is male or female, but also about whether one is senior or junior.  As our junior colleagues are the most vulnerable and least likely to have a voice in print and the scholarly community, we ought to think twice before we silence their concerns, as many on this list of tried.

(2) The second issue is about trial by press. There are several concerns here. One is the stigma attached to the victims and complainants---reporting sexual harassment is often described by such individuals as a second assault. Then there is the very real and credible concern that people's reputations can be damaged by false accusations. I take the latter possibility seriously. Berkeley seems to be on a role with handling sexual harassment badly, alternating between suppressing the issue and then publicly misrepresenting facts of cases.  The only solution to both problems, it seems to me, is to be willing to talk about the issue, for if we treat the very mention of sexual harassment as inappropriate for public discussion in scholarly settings, we do nothing to deflate the stigma of reporting such cases, or the stigma of being falsely accused.

Best wishes,
Shyam Ranganathan
Department of Philosophy
York University
Toronto






On 07/10/2016 9:28 AM, Isabelle Ratie wrote:
Dear friends and colleagues,

We are all tired of this discussion and I apologize for belatedly adding my voice to it. My intention was to remain silent, but I have changed my mind because Audrey Truschke has rightly pointed out that so far those voicing their disagreement with her were all men.

I am a woman. I am European. There is hardly any need to say that I consider sexual harrassment utterly unacceptable. Yet as Walter Slaje and Arlo Griffiths, I did find Audrey Truschke's message somewhat disturbing. I realize that she had nothing but excellent intentions in posting it and this is certainly not to hurt her feelings; besides, Philipp Maas is probably right in pointing out that this whole disagreement might simply betray a cultural gap between the USA and Europe (which, as he also pointed out, is NOT to say that Europeans would take sexual harrassment less seriously than Americans, but only that for instance my French colleagues and myself would expect such a grave matter to be judged by an independent court of law, not by a mere university committee!). Anyway as Walter Slaje, I find public pillorying extremely unpleasant and dangerous, especially when a defamation lawsuit has been filed and a court decision is still awaited: this defamation lawsuit is presented in the post as a devious way of "silencing" the victims, and the rhetoric of the post leaves little room for the possibility that a wrongly accused man may be fighting to get his reputation back when his whole career and probably much more are at stake. Contrary to some of those who have contributed to this discussion, I believe that we cannot afford to let the medias' carelessness and self-righteousness force us to "take sides" in matters that are not theirs or ours - but only the courts' - to judge. I entirely agree with Audrey that sexual harrassment is awful and that it can occur in all academic disciplines, including ours (and indeed why would it not?); but it seems to me that it's also important to keep in mind that innocent men and women are sometimes wrongly accused; that this is why courts must be allowed to investigate in their own time and independently; that filing a defamation lawsuit is not a sure sign that a guilty individual is trying to silence his victims; and that a scholarly forum such as INDOLOGY is not an appropriate place to discuss such matters.

With best wishes to all,
Isabelle
-- 
Isabelle Ratié
Professor of Sanskrit Language and Literatures
Sorbonne Nouvelle (University of Paris 3)


_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)