On 29 July 2016 at 15:23, Howard Resnick <hr@ivs.edu> wrote:
I would be surprised if any of us want to enage him as a fellow scholar. He is simply a piece of contemporary Hindu history, however bizarre and disreputable one may find him. Scholars not inclined to contemporary Hindu affairs may well find little in Malhotra to interest them. 

​I'd also be interested in thoughtful analyses of Malhotra as part of contemporary Hindu history, as an object of study rather than a contributor to current academic discourse.