Dear Colleagues,

In the Mitākṣarā commentary on Yājñavalkysmṛti 1.319, royal edicts should include a date given in two ways:

[lekhyam…] yuktaṃ kālena ca dvividhena śakanṛpātītarūpeṇa saṃvatsararūpeṇa ca kālena

The first scheme is clear era to me, namely the Śaka era (78 CE), but the date "according to Saṃvatsara" is not. A little digging suggested that it might refer to the Vikrama era or, more likely it seemed, to one of the cyclical years of the 60-year Bārhaspatya saṃvatsara of Jupiter (per Sewell and Dikshit’s Indian Calendar).

I figured someone could quickly set me straight.

Thanks in advance,

Don Davis

Dept of Asian Studies

University of Texas at Austin