More reviews on Johannes Bronkhorst’s thesis: Konrad Klaus in Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 161 (2011): 216-221, Jason Neelis in Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 18.3 (2008): 381-3; John Cort, Religious Studies Review 33.2 (2007): 171-172; K.T.S. Sarao in Orientalische Literatur-Zeitung 103.2 (2008): 250-254; Rüdiger Schmitt in Acta Orientalia 69 2008: 319-32, and Alexander Wynne in the H-Buddhism List (July 2011).

Best, xel Michaels

Von: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces@list.indology.info> im Auftrag von Artur Karp <karp@uw.edu.pl>
Datum: Monday 11 April 2016 at 12:30
An: Roland Steiner <steiner@staff.uni-marburg.de>
Cc: "indology@list.indology.info" <indology@list.indology.info>
Betreff: Re: [INDOLOGY] Misunderstood origins

> a bit to start a discussion? ;)

Frankly?

Quite frankly - I'd rather prefer following the discussion on the contents of Prof. Bronkhorst's paper.

Or - is there somewhere a trace of the Buddhologists' (Historians of India, Historians of Indian Literature) reaction to its theses?

Best,

Artur Karp

2016-04-11 9:42 GMT+02:00 Roland Steiner <steiner@staff.uni-marburg.de>:

In support of Prof. Silk's remarks I would like to point to the following short paper by Claudius Naumann:

"Versiegende Quellen. Einige Anmerkungen über den Sinn und Unsinn von Internet-Verweisen in wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten". In: Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 162.2 (2012), pp. 460-464.

Best,
Roland Steiner

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)