Dear Colleague,
With due respect to Professor Thieme, a different explanation might not be uncalled for. Perhaps we talked over this sometime adducing information on publications. Thieme's memory is indelible - a rare combinartion of scholarship and humility. So I do not like to further extend my replies.
Best wishes
Dipak Bhattacharya

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Joanna Jurewicz <j.jurewicz@uw.edu.pl> wrote:
In the gveda this number is often activated via the phrase 'tríḥ saptá'. See Thieme P. 1985. ‘The First Verse of the Triaptīyam (AV, Ś 1.1 ~ AV, P 1.6) and the Beginnings of Sanskrit Linguistics’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 105, 3: 559-565. 
Best, 
Joanna



---
dr hab. Joanna Jurewicz, prof. UW
Katedra Azji Południowej /Chair of South Asia
Wydział Orientalistyczny / Faculty of Oriental Studies
Uniwersytet Warszawski /University of Warsaw
ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28
00-927 Warszawa

2016-03-18 12:07 GMT+01:00 Dipak Bhattacharya <dipak.d2004@gmail.com>:
21 is a holy number pertaining, originally, to the twenty-one declensional forms of word --the three-into-seven declensional forms. The matter is not undiscussed.
Best
DB

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:58 PM, James Hartzell <james.hartzell@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Colleagues

I’ve come across two references in the Brāhmaṇas to the Sun as ‘the twenty-first’ –

ŚB 6.7.1.1: …” It (the plate) is round, for he (the Sun) is round. It has twenty-one knobs, for he is the twenty-first. He wears it with the knobs outside, for the knobs are his (the Sun's) rays, and his rays are outside." (Eggeling 1894:265),”
and
AB 4.18: "They perform the ceremonies of the Ekaviṃśa day, which is the equator, dividing the year (into two equal parts). By means of the performance of this day, the gods had raised the Sun up to the heavens. This Ekaviṃśa day on which the Divākīrtya mantra (was produced) is preceded by ten days, and followed by ten days, and is in the midst (of both periods). On both sides it is thus put in a Virāṭ: (the number ten). Being thus put in a Virāṭ (in the number ten) on both sides, this (Ekaviṃśa, i.e. the Sun) becomes not disturbed in his course through these worlds." (Haug 1977:288-289).

Does anyone have other references to the Sun as the 21st, and any other explanations for this other than these two Brahmana explanations?

Cheers

James Hartzell, PhD(2x)
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC)
The University of Trento, Italy

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)


_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)