Thank you for your contribution.
All the mss of this commentary I could access are in devanÄgarÄ«.
I would add that certain devanÄgarÄ« Å›va and sva can be easily mistaken for kha. Even if we do not consider the pronounciation and we rather stay on the paleographic level, it is very easy to explain how dhaneÅ›vara° could become ca nekhara°. That's why I took for granted that ca nekharÄlamkÄra is just a corruption of dhaneÅ›varÄlaṃkÄra and as such not worth taking in consideration.