Dear colleagues,
I seem to encounter the word vÄrja in the meaning 'lotus' in an 8th-century Sanskrit inscription. I don't find any entry vÄrja in the usual dictionaries. However, I do find it in Narahari's RÄjanighaṇá¹u (10.173):
pÄthojaá¹ kamalaá¹ nabhaá¹ ca nalinÄmbhojÄmbujanmÄmbujaá¹
Å›rÄ«padmÄmburuhÄbjapadmajalajÄny ambhoruhaá¹ sÄrasam |
paá¹…kejaá¹ sarasÄ«ruhaá¹ ca kuá¹apaṃ pÄthoruhaá¹ puá¹£karaá¹
vÄrjaá¹ tÄmarasaá¹ kuÅ›eÅ›ayakaje kañjÄravinde tathÄ ||
This is from GRETIL: I am unable to check any printed edition. But the meter (ÅšÄrdÅ«lavikrÄ«á¸ita) seems to guarantee that vÄrjaá¹ here is not a typo for vÄrijaá¹ (on which, see Rau, 'Lotusblumen', 1954, p. 510). According to C. Vogel, Indian Lexicography (1979), pp. 376-7, this RÄjanighaṇá¹u would be no older than 1375.
Does anyone know a first-millennium attestation of vÄrja- 'lotus'?
Is it more likely that we confront here a phonetic development from vÄrija-, or the use of the Vedic stem vÄr- in a post-Vedic compound vÄr-ja-?
Thank you for any comments and further references.
Arlo Griffiths
École française d'Extrême-Orient
Université de Lyon 3 – Jean Moulin