मानवाधिकारा आदरणीयाः

Dear Piotr,

Thanks for these links. Although they concern “post-1800” issues, they may be of interest to list members for instance in the light of debates on the compatibility or otherwise of Indian traditions with Human Rights – the latter according to some all implied by the well-known ‘Golden Rule’ known in one form or another in most major civilisations. As for Indian philosophical traditions, at least Sāṁkhya acknowledged humanity as unitary (SK 53 ... mānuṣyaś caikavidhaḥ ... ) and we do find occasional formulations of the ‘Golden Rule’ in Sāṁkhya-like contexts as I once pointed out in a contribution (www.academia.edu/7117708/) in a volume I co-edited in 1999 with Prof. Karel van Kooij, Violence Denied .... The thematic of this by now almost “antique” volume finds, unfortunately, abundant illustration in the Kashmir Report “Denied” (2015) for which you provided the link.

Sometimes things can change for the better, and public opinion has some impact however difficult to measure it may be. To improve Human Rights conditions they need to be known both by authorities and the wider public. The Declaration of Human Rights is now available also in numerous Indian languages, including Sanskrit

(www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Pages/Language.aspx?LangID=skt

nice reading exercise for modern Sanskrit),

and Kashmiri (www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Pages/Language.aspx?LangID=ksh

only in Perso-Arabic script, the Devanagari version a desideratum if not available elsewhere).

When I became for a short period active member of the Maastricht branch of Amnesty International in 1977, we “adopted” among countries with very high numbers of political prisoners detained without (fair) trial, Israel (under Begin), Poland (PRL under Jaroszewicz) and Eastern Germany (DDR, under Honecker), and started to write, both to authorities and to the prisoners themselves, with the hope at least to improve the prisoners' conditions. At present the human rights conditions have become significantly better in any case in the last two areas. If I understood correctly from the only easily readable part, the Preamble, and from discussions such as P.V. Kane vol. V pt. II p. 1663ff, also the Indian constitution was formulated and meant to be in accordance with Human Rights, but this is perhaps a topic not most suitable for this list.

Best, Jan

मानवाधिकारा आदरणीया भारतीयसंविधानानुसारेणापि

 


      

Jan E.M. HOUBEN

Directeur d’Études

Sources et histoire de la tradition sanskrite

École Pratique des Hautes Études

Sciences historiques et philologiques 

54, rue Saint-Jacques

CS 20525 – 75005 Paris

johannes.houben@ephe.sorbonne.fr

https://ephe-sorbonne.academia.edu/JanEMHouben

www.ephe.fr


On 2 July 2015 at 19:02, Piotr Balcerowicz <p.balcerowicz@uw.edu.pl> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,

Even though the following does not rise questions concerning the past of India, in a way it is relevant to Indological research as one of background factors.
Here’s a link to a highly interesting discussion on serious human rights violations, crimes perpetrated by the Indian armed forces and their impunity in the Indian-administered state of Jammu & Kashmir:
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestory/2015/07/kashmir-human-rights-abuse-150701222455840.html
(emblematic is the Hindutva-saffron T-shirt not to be missed...).

The background for this discussion is the recent report by Amnesty International on human rights violations in Kashmir:
https://www.amnesty.org.in/show/news/accountability-still-missing-for-human-rights-violations-in-jammu-kashmir/

The full text of the report:
https://www.amnesty.org.in/images/uploads/articles/Kashmir_Report_Web_version_%281%29.pdf

Strange as it may seem, most Indologists are not aware that India-administered part of the state of Jammu & Kashmir is the most militarized place in the world with the population of approx. 12 million people and approx. 750,000 - 850,000 armed forces, even though such heavy military presence has no real strategic justification. According to conservative estimates approx. 70,000 people were killed there at the hands of the Indian army (other sources put the figure of 100,000 civilians). More than 7,000 mass graves of civilians have been discovered in recent years, in only five districts (out of a total of 25 districts -- no such searches have so far been conducted in the other districts; one of the earlier reports: http://www.kashmirprocess.org/reports/graves/toc .html)). There are at least 8,000 documented abductions and killings of civilians by Indian armed forces. Lawyers in Kashmir have reported crimes in more than 15,000 cases of alledged crimes committed by the Indian armed forces, but all such police investigations and court proceedings have been consistently blocked by the Indian authorities. Numerous inverviews with Kashmiris conducted on the spot reveal that virtually within every Kashmiri family there is someone who has become a victim of repressions and torture. No even a single case judicial proceedings has been been brought to an end (except for two cases before military courts, but they do not dislose any further information about the actual outcome), which is absolutely shocking in a country that aspires to be governed by law. That also calls into question the myth of Indian democracy.
Information on the crimes and human rights violations in Kashmir very rarely reach the public, and even Indologists are barely aware of not only the scale of these crimes, but even of their existence. These appalling crimes and the scale of human rights violations is something which is quite difficult to ignore, also for Indologists. Dealing with South Asia and doing research on Indian past should not make Indologists immune to such news concerning Indian modernity, who should be critical in such cases. That is also a part of India we do research on, unfortunately. Unbiased criticism of India’s policies is by definition constructive and is in the best interest of India and its citizens, too.

With best regards,
Piotr Balcerowicz
--------------------------------
www.orient.uw.edu.pl/balcerowicz

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)