Despite my profound agreement with Dominik on the great good that Indology has done, I struggle with the statement below, since it seems to claim for all Indologists at all times a moral and methodological purity that history clearly belies. Please note that Al Collins said ‘at times’, a phrase that leaves open and debatable the frequency and severity of problems within Indology.
Best,
Howard
On Jul 27, 2015, at 3:18 PM, Dominik Wujastyk <wujastyk@gmail.com> wrote:
In this sense, it *is* indeed very controversial to say that "Indologyhas at times been part of this misunderstanding."