Dominik, the justification on those grounds would go something like
this.
Malhotra defends "tradition," which is embodied in Sanskrit texts.
Therefore, he is not bound by any modern academic conventions
because he follows the traditional system, the one expressed in
Sanskrit. And if
“Sanskrit does not
even have quotation marks in its character set,” why would he, a defender of the
"tradition," use them.
The use of
iti has already been mentioned, so the whole
justification is, of course,
null and void, even from a
'traditional' point of view.
Luis
_____
On 7/19/2015 9:26 AM, Dominik Wujastyk
wrote:
I entirely fail to understand
the defence of plagiarism on the grounds that Sanskrit has no
quotation marks. Malhotra's books are written in English.
Dominik Wujastyk
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)