Svami Satya Prakash Sarasvati and Satyakam Vidyalankar’s translation of the Ṛgveda was published in 12 physical volumes, 1977-1987, being only the third complete English translation of the Ṛgveda to be published. It was preceded by that of H. H. Wilson in 6 volumes, 1850-1888, and that of Ralph T. H. Griffith in 4 volumes, 1889-1892. It avowedly follows the Arya Samaj line of interpretation, which treats the various Vedic gods (Agni, Indra, Mitra, etc.) as being names for the one God, thus translating them all as “God.” The Arya Samaj line of interpretation specifically rejects Sāyaṇa’s commentary, regarding its interpretations as being late and incorrect. Wilson in his pioneering translation relied fully on Sāyaṇa’s commentary, following its interpretations throughout. Recently R. L. Kashyap, who produced the fourth complete English translation of the Ṛgveda (published in 12 physical volumes, 2004-2009), pointed out that Satya Prakash Sarasvati and Satyakam Vidyalankar’s translation largely copies Wilson’s translation. This is ironic, since replacing the names Agni, Indra, Mitra, etc., with God is not enough to remove Sāyaṇa’s interpretations from it.

On the plagiarism aspect, compare the statement made in the current article that Luis provided a link to, where Andrew J. Nicholson writes about Rajiv Malhotra: “There he steals my words but replaces the name ‘Vijnanabhikshu’ (a 16th century Bhedabhedavadin) with ‘Vivekananda’ (a 19th century Advaitin), as if they were interchangeable.” Satya Prakash Sarasvati and Satyakam Vidyalankar’s translation has been reprinted in 2008 and 2011, and remains available. As far as I know, no one has called upon the publishers to address this issue.

Best regards,

David Reigle

Colorado, U.S.A.