If you search the book at Amazon, you can read significant parts of it (“Look inside this book”). The authors are serious, well-read scholars and have put a colossal amount of work into their effort. The book strikes me as an important contribution whose ideas should be seriously considered by indologists. George HartOn Jun 12, 2015, at 5:48 AM, Dominik Wujastyk <wujastyk@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________On 12 June 2015 at 14:15, Philipp Maas <philipp.a.maas@gmail.com> wrote:In reading these lines, I get quite puzzled. Are historical-critical methods in general flawed, or only when practiced by Germans?
Only when practised by Germans, as any Italian would certainly answer :-)
(This refers to a running joke between some of us British, German and Italian philologists here at the Vienna department.)
I suppose the Adluri & Bagchee book deserves a more serious response, but I'm not interested personally. How did this get by the commissioning editor at OUP NY?Best,Dominik Wujastyk
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
indology-owner@list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)