न हन्ति गमनं कस्य मधुरध्वनि रागतः ।
यच्चूतं मधुपव्रातो मधुरध्वनिरागतः ॥ ४ ॥
प.वि. -
न हन्ति गमनं कस्य मधुः अध्वनि रागतः । यत् चूतं मधुप-व्रातः मधुर-ध्वनिः आगतः ॥
अन्वयः -
मधुः कस्य अध्वनि रागतः गमनं न हन्ति यत् मधुरध्वनिः मधुपव्रातः चूतं आगतः ।
व्याख्या -
कस्य नरस्य । मधुः वसन्तः । अध्वनि पथि । रागतः रागवशात् । मधुपव्रातो भ्रमरश्रेणिः । किंविशिष्टो मधुपव्रातः मधुरध्वनिः ।
As for the original question of Mr. Harry Spier in some publications an avagraha is put to indicate a coalesced/elided अ and two for two such अs. One has मयाsदेयम् for mayā adeyam and मयाssदेयम् for mayā ādeyam.
I did not see the latter in manuscripts.
Best
DB
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Harry Spier <hspier.muktabodha@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Dear list members,I need to show to some non-sanskritists that given a Sanskrit phrase in devanagari, that how you put in the word breaks in the transliteration can result in phrases with very different meanings.Can any of the list members give examples of short sentences in simple sanskrit in devanagari that when the words are split differently in the transliteration give grammatically correct Sanskrit sentences but produce Sanskrit phrases with "radically" different meanings.For my purposes simple Sanskrit sentences are better than more complicated Sanskrit from the literature. And sentences that give very different meanings depending on how the words are broken up are better than more subtle differences.Thanks,Harry Spier
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info