It was simply said  "Śaṅkara's Saundaryalaharī", not "Saundaryalaharī by the the author of the Brahmasūtrabhāṣya".

The fact is that the Saundaryalaharī is ascribed to (one) Śaṅkara by the mediaeval scholarly indigenous tradition, which considers that it is the same Śaṅkara as the one who composed the Brahmasūtrabhāṣya. See e.g. the Vani Vilas Press edition (under the direction of the Sringeri Matha) of the "complete works" of  Śaṅkara https://archive.org/details/CompleteWorksOfSriSankaracharyaIn20Volumes1910Edition

which includes also  for example the "Tantric" Prapañcasāra (vol. 19) once edited by A. Avalon.

Now there are the critical studies by Paul Hacker, Hajime Nakamura etc. which have tried to distinguish between the different authorships and to determine which works can be ascribed to the "original" early Advaitin philosopher called Śaṅkara.

Nevertheless, would it be really useful or necessary to say something like "pseudo-Śaṅkara'" for the author(s) of the Śaṅkarian Hyms? Or to talk here about "ideologically biased ascriptions". I would rather consider that these ascriptions where firstly made, in the course of time, by the different Śaṅkarian traditions themselves, and in this way are highly significant.

Best wishes

Christophe Vielle

Le 1 oct. 2014 à 10:52, Hartmut Buescher <buescherhartmut@gmail.com> a écrit :

Dear Dominik,
 
thank you, indeed, for providing a link to the premiere performance of the last major work
by the late Sir John Tavener: a modern classical setting of  “Śaṅkara's Saundaryalaharī”.
Very interesting!
 
However, given this is a scholarly list, it may perhaps be necessary to be slightly more
careful with reproducing ideologically biased ascriptions of authorship.
As well-known, the name of the Advaita philosopher “Śaṅkara” has unfortunately
served as a hook for innumerable such ascriptions to hang on.
 
Needless to particularly emphasize, there is a long historical gap between
the times of the Advaita author and the origin of the ŚrīVidyā tradition to which
the Saundaryalaharī pertains.
 
Best wishes,
 
Hartmut Buescher

2014-10-01 8:38 GMT+02:00 Dominik Wujastyk <wujastyk@gmail.com>:

Dear colleagues,

The last major work by the late Sir John Tavener, the British composer, was a modern classical setting of Śaṅkara's Saundaryalaharī.  It received its premiere on Sunday last, at the Barbican in London.  Sir John worked with W. Norman Brown's text and translation (Harvard, 1958).

It was broadcast live on radio, and can be heard on BBC Radio 3's website for a few more days: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04jj824.  (Listeners outside the UK may need a VPN connection to a computer inside the UK.)

One listener who attended the premiere, said,

It was indeed an amazing flood, a wash of sound and texture, and indeed text.  In the hall itself, I was rather tense and aware that it might seem quite long, but after it was over, there was a sense that it could easily have been enjoyed for longer, and the radio broadcast is very easy to appreciate.

The translation of the text (there was so much!) was put on big screens, but I am not sure that really helped - that ancient Sanskrit has a different flavour all together.  Of course that was interesting in itself, but overall, the music was the embodiment (as it were) of the text, so the specific words weren't necessarily needed.

It was a flood, and it was beautiful.

Another performance is being planned for Singapore next year.

Best,
Dominik Wujastyk

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info

–––––––––––––––––––

Christophe Vielle

Louvain-la-Neuve

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info