Full sympathy!

Though I have no experience with OBO I have experience of writing for Indian origin encyclopaedias. The first time I wrote at the age of 26-30 I was paid nothing by an ancient Government Institute of fame. Next I wrote for one Hindu Encyclopaedia and paid half of what was promised. The third time I had an experience with an Institute at Bangalore. They did not pay anything. None of them replied to my queries.

Only the Asiatic Society, Calcutta paid.

But at present I decline to write for such projects.

Naturally, I have full sympathy for you but think that you are not in so bad a position as that in which a connectionless, non-influential Indian contributor often is.

Best

DB


On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Dominik Wujastyk <wujastyk@gmail.com> wrote:
A few years ago, I wrote an annotated bibliography on Indian Medicine for the OBO project.  When I originally did the work, it took *much* longer than I had anticipated.  I had thought I could just dust off a teaching bibliography, but it turned out to be several weeks of careful work.  I should think my hourly rate of payment for the work was about 10% of the minimum wage.  But I was pleased with the result - I think I did a useful job.  And OUP's online site is good, and adds various nice internet-tweaks.  But it's a licensed product.  It's not available to the public, but only to institutional subscribers.  Individual articles, like mine, are apparently sold through Amazon and other outlets for about $7 a pop.

Last week I was contacted by OUP and invited to update the bibliography.  They offered no payment. I asked, and was offered $50 worth of OUP books.  I thought that was not worthwhile.  I can't revise the bibliography meaningfully in 90 minutes.  So I asked whether I could at least have free access to OBO in return for doing the revisions.  I was told that this decision was above my editor's authority, and therefore "no." 

I have now sent OUP the following decision not to continue revising my (their) bibliography: 

After some reflection, I can't see why I would do this revision work for no meaningful remuneration, and no way of accessing my own work once online, and when OUP is presumably making profits from licensing the work I created.  I hope you can see that there is little incentive for me.  I think, actually, that the overall business model is seriously flawed.

I would feel more motivated to do it, I think, if you were able to find someone in OUP with the authority to give me permanent gratis access to OBO.

Sincerely,

I know that several of my colleagues here in the INDOLOGY forum have also contributed excellent guides to OBO, so I thought I would share my experience.

I have managed to write this whole email without using the word "exploitation."  Oops...

Sincerely,
Dominik

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info