Maṇḍanamiśra treats the Buddhist Asatkhyāti among four theories of error in his Vibhramaviveka (5-27). Although he may not be seen as a "later Brahmanical thinker", it is certainly worthwhile to consult Lambert Schmithausen's edition, which is accompanied by a translation, a running commentary, and a thorough survey on the subject. See there on pp. 93ff and 234ff.

Lambert Schmithausen: Maṇḍanamiśra's Vibhra­ma­vi­vekaḥ. Mit einer Studie zur Ent­wicklung der indischen Irrtumslehre. [ÖAW SB 247,1 = VKSKS 2.] Wien 1965.

​Regards,
WS
​

-----------------------------
Prof. Dr. Walter Slaje
Hermann-Löns-Str. 1
D-99425 Weimar
Deutschland

Ego ex animi mei sententia spondeo ac polliceor
studia humanitatis impigro labore culturum et provecturum
non sordidi lucri causa nec ad vanam captandam gloriam,
sed quo magis veritas propagetur et lux eius, qua salus
humani generis continetur, clarius effulgeat.
Vindobonae, die XXI. mensis Novembris MCMLXXXIII.


2014-07-25 10:24 GMT+02:00 Michael Williams <michael.williams@univie.ac.at>:
Dear list members,
I am currently becoming more interested in the doctrine of asatkhyātivāda
and its critique by later Brahmanical thinkers. The primary sources I have
read (e.g., Vācaspati and Citsukha) present it in a confused and rather
unconvincing way, and the secondary sources I have seen are threadbare.
Does anyone know of a good specialist study of this doctrine and its
origins?
Many thanks,
Michael Williams,
University of Vienna.

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
 INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
 http://listinfo.indology.info