Dear Elliot,
Thank you, but isn't HelArAja 10th century? I thought that was widely accepted, and is the basis for the terminus ante queen accepted by Halbfass, Aklujkar, and Isaacson...
I hope you are well. It's been a long time...
Cheers,
John
Sent from my iPhone
Dear John,
sucaritamiśra’s kāśikā appears to refer to the beginning of candrānanda’s commentary as bhāṣya here (part of comment to ślokavārttikam 1.23:1.8.25-9.5):
na param anupāttaḥ sambandhaḥ, niṣprayojanaścety āha — yopītidvayena | kāṇāde hi tantre kriyānantaryarūpaḥ sambandho
darśitaḥ | evaṃ hi tatra bhāṣyakāreṇoktaṃ - ko dharma ityādikān śiṣyeṇodīritān pañcapraśnānapekṣyāha - athāto dharmaṃ vyākhyāsyāma iti |
Kei Kataoka places sucaritamiśra in the first half of the 11th century (Sucaritamisra' s Critique of Apohα… 2014 (page 341(22)). If his arguments hold, sucarita is somewhat earlier than helārāja.
Elliot
Elliot M. Stern
552 South 48th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19143-2029
United States of America
telephone: 215-747-6204
mobile: 267-240-8418
emstern@verizon.net
Dear John,
A detailed discussion of the chronology of Candraananda can be found in pp. 140-143 of Harunaga Isaacson's Materials for the study of the Vaiśeṣika system (unpublished PhD thesis, Leiden 1995, Rijksuniversiteit).
With kind regards,
Vincent
Dr. Vincent Eltschinger
Institute for the Cultural and Intellectual History of Asia
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Apostelgasse 23
A-1030 Vienna
Vincent.Eltschinger@oeaw.ac.at
0043 1 51581 6434
0041 79 7347694
________________________________________
Von: INDOLOGY [indology-bounces@list.indology.info]" im Auftrag von "John Nemec [jwn3y@cms.mail.virginia.edu]
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Juni 2014 19:54
An: indology@list.indology.info
Betreff: Re: [INDOLOGY] Candraananda's Date
Dear Indology Listmembers,
Is anyone aware of any work done on the date of Candraananda, the author of the Vai”se.sikasuutrav.rtti?
I am aware of Aklujkar’s contribution to the question (Aklujkar, Ashok, “Candraananda’s Date,” Journal of the Oriental Institute (Baroda) 19.4(1969-1970): 340-341) and that Halbfass addressed the question in his very fine book, _On Being and What There is_ (1992: 79-80, 237, and 262, fn. 2).
Any further information would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
John
__________________________________
John Nemec, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Indian Religions and South Asian Studies
Department of Religious Studies
University of Virginia
323 Gibson Hall / 1540 Jefferson Park Avenue
Charlottesville, VA 22904 (USA)
nemec@virginia.edu
+1-434-924-6716
http://virginia.academia.edu/JNemec
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info