Dear Jacob,
 
likewise familiar with this orthographical phenomenon in Sanskrit Mss,
my guess is that,
although the scribes were necessarily influenced by the vernaculars,
and probably the more the less educated they were
– the phenomenon as such being long since known (as censurable),
as Stefan Baums and others perceptively pointed out – ,
the fact that its occurrence remains sporadically and rather associated with
specific scribes/Mss (say, rather than ever gaining broader general acceptance
and application) would nevertheless in principle support Dominik’s point
(given he may have exactly implied the scribes in their social context),
when he characterized this (in Skt. texts impertinent) orthographic feature
as “scribal carelessness”.
 
Fortsat god arbejdlyst,
 
Hartmut Buesche
r


2014-06-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 <jacob@fabularasa.dk>:
Dear list,

I wonder if anyone could explain the occurence in some Sanskrit manuscripts (possibly influenced by vernacularisms) of adding an anusvara before a nasal. I have attached three examples containing the following readings:

Ex. 1: तंन् (तंम् before sandhi)
Ex. 2: महाश्मशांने
Ex. 3: दांन

Any suggestions or clarifications would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,
Jacob

Jacob Schmidt-Madsen
Assistant Teacher
Department of Indology
University of Copenhagen
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info