Dear Colleague,
If I correctly understood your statements, the coronation should be annual. In that case the number of years that elapsed since the first coronation should not differ from the number of coronations r4ehearsed since then. Am I correct?
Best
DB


On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Artur Karp <karp@uw.edu.pl> wrote:

Dear List, 

 

Recently, I came upon a claim (not published so far) that the Aśokan formula (X-number)varṣābhiiktena [like in RE I, Girnar, dbādasavāsābhisitenadoes not convey the information on the number of years since the king's anointment, but, rather, the information on the successive number of abhishekas the king would perform on every anniversary of his rule's inauguration. 

 

So - not "the year X since my inauguration", but, against the standard renderings: "the year of my Xth abhisheka".

 

Is there any linguistic reason for this kind of the formula's reinterpretation? The compound's structure?

 

While looking through materials I have on hand, I came across the following statement in Jan Gonda's 1957 paper on Indian kingship (Ancient Indian kingship from the religious point of view, Numen, Vol. 4, Fasc. 2, p. 135): 

 

<<As  the  Asvamedha  is  the  king  of  sacrifices  701),  and  as  on  the  other hand the  sacrificer,  i.e.  the  king,  is  identical with  the  asvamedha,  certain  peculiarities  of  this  ritual  are  stated  to  correspond  to  certain  qualities  of  the  king.  Thus  he  is  disposed  to  be  "strong  in  arms",  because  the  front  legs  of  two  goats  sacrificed  during  the  asvamedha  are tied - "he  thereby lays  strength  into  the  front  legs" 702)  and  strong  in  thighs,  for  similar  reasons.  Before  we  leave  this  point  we  should  call attention  to  an  important  statement  made in  the  Visnudharmottara-purana  703).  On  every  anniversary  of  the  first  'coronation'  the  king  should  repeat  the  rites;  this  leads  to  welfare,  to  increase  of  the  country,  to  the  destruction  of  the  enemies  and  so  on.  Then  the  'inauguration'  has  become  cyclic,  annually  carrying  the  ruler  and  his  realm  beyond  a  difficult  stage,  and  recreating  the  beneficial  power  inherent  in  kingship [boldfaces mine, A. K.]>>

 

Is there - apart from the Vishnudharmottara-purana fragment quoted by Gonda - any evidence for such an annual royal ritual to be found anywhere in the corpus of Śastric/Buddhist literature?

 

Any comment would be much appreciated.



Best, 

Artur Karp

Senior Lecturer in Sanskrit and Pali (ret.)
South Asian Studies Deptt
Oriental Faculty
University of Warsaw
Poland






_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info