Don,
Have a look at D.C. Sircar's Indian Epigraphy, pp. 66-67; also my Indian Epigraphy p. 132, for further references. It has been suggested (I don't remember exactly where -- this may go all the way back to Buehler's Indische Palaeographie) that archival copies of land grants were kept on cloth.
Rich
Rich Salomon
On 10/31/2013 8:41 AM, Donald R Davis wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I am working on the /Smṛticandrikā/ of Devaṇṇabhaṭṭa and its discussion
of documents. Several passages in the sub-section on /rājaśāsana/
enjoin a king to inscribe a land grant “/paṭe vā tāmrapaṭṭe vā/.”rendered /paṭa/ here as “cloth,” which makes no sense to me, as I have
Yājñavalkya (1.319) is the first, I think. Most translators havenon-durable material for an important inscription. So, /Amarakośa/ (and
never seen a cloth inscription of this sort and it seems an unusuallyCan anyone help me identify /paṭa/ here more certainly? I don’t know
MW lists this, too) gives several synonyms, all of which point to the
chirauli/chironji nut (Buchanania Latifolia) or, I suppose, its bark.
_______________________________________________
the first thing about trees and this appears to be a common enough tree
in India and other parts of Asia, but is the bark of this tree meant
here? Thanks for any help or leads you may have.
Best,
Don Davis
Dept. of Asian Studies
University of Texas at Austin
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info
--
----------------------
Richard Salomon
Department of Asian Languages and Literature
University of Washington, Box 353521
Seattle WA 98195-3521
USA
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info