As remarked in this thread, the term “experimental archaeology” has been used, apparently by extension, in cases that are not “archaeological” in the strict sense of the word (e.g., in connection with reconstructions based on data in the history of science such as experimental constructions based on Leonardo Da Vinci’s designs of a parachute and a tank.)
By a similar extension of “experimental archaeological” methodology, would it be possible to test Paa.nini’s “GRAMMAR” with regard to linguistic data that are geographically and chronologically AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE to this ancient device of which the precise purpose and original context remain unclear and disputed to this day?
In other words, would it be possible to give Paa.nini’s grammar a “test-ride” in the ocean of early Middle Indic of which samples are epigraphically attested, geographically and chronologically close to Paa.nini’s native area: king Aśoka’s inscriptions, found throughout “India” including the North West.?
One attempt to do this can be found in my « Nārāyaṇa Bhaṭṭa’s Prakriyā-sarvasva and Pāṇini’s Śe. » that appeared in Studies in Sanskrit Grammars : Proc. of the 14th World Skt. Conference, ed. by G. Cardona, A. Aklujkar, H. Ogawa : 163-194 (Delhi: D.K. Publishers 2012), page 166 footnote 6 .
Many thanks to Hermann Tull, Edeltraud HarzerClear and Jan Houben for their help with my query.
In its wake, the question of experimental archaeology and its use for the study of ancient India has been raised by some.
Kenoyer is doing a lot of it, but essentially in the field of harappan archaeology (last I know, more particularly in the case of bead making).
Another field which could be extremely useful in this matter is not experimental archaeology, but ethnoarchaeology.
During a recent ethnoarchaeological field trip in Nepal, I could document some extremely archaic way of pot making which could hold very valuable information to understand how the ukhā and mahāvavīra pots were actually made during the Agniṣṭoma and Agnicayana, and what this particular technique entails (its origin, the composition of the material, the durability of the pots, explain some strange saṃhitās/sūtras prescriptions, etc.).
I plan to put this information on the web as soon as possible, and the complementary research I make now for this purpose prompted my query.
Thanks again,
Dr François Voegeli
Senior FNS Researcher
Institut d'Archéologie et des Sciences de l'Antiquité
Anthropole, bureau 4018
Faculté des Lettres
Université de Lausanne
CH-1015 Lausanne
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info