Dear Tim, dear Martin,

thanks for the interesting points (and for pointing to the 2005 article I had missed). I can only add that in Mīmāṃsā discussions "aṣṭavarṣaṃ brāhmaṇam upanayīta tam adhyāpayet" is the standard reason adduced by Prābhākaras as a *śruti* support of the adhyāpanavidhi, i.e. the idea that there is a duty to teach the Veda and that one's duty to learn the Veda is only a subsidiary to it. Thus, at least for the Mīmāṃsakas (the Bhāṭṭas dissent with the Prābhākara view, but not with the *śruti* status of the prescription) the prescription "aṣṭavarṣaṃ brāhmaṇam upanayīta tam adhyāpayet" has a śruti-status. It is, thus, seen as coming from a Brāhmaṇa. 

Best,

elisa freschi




Dr. Elisa Freschi
Institute for the Cultural and Intellectual History of Asia
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Apostelgasse 23
1030 Vienna
Austria
Phone +43 1 51581 6433
Fax +43 1 51581 6410
http://elisafreschi.blogspot.com
http://oeaw.academia.edu/elisafreschi

On 06/giu/2013, at 19:17, Lubin, Tim wrote:

upanīyayet seems to be a conflation of upanīya or upanayīta and upanayet, all forms being common in this context.

VaikhānasaGS 6.7 quotes the first half as śruti:
brāhmaṇyāṃ brāhmaṇāj jātamātrasya brāhmaṇasya prathamajanma syād upanayanasaṃskāre dvitīyaṃ bhavati dvitīyajanmany ācāryaḥ pitā sāvitrī mātā dvābhyāṃ janmabhyāṃ dvijo bhavaty < aṣṭavarṣaṃ brāhmaṇam upanayīta- > iti śrutis tasmād garbhādhānādyaṣṭame varṣe brāhmaṇasyopanayanaṃ śreṣṭhaṃ 

"aṣṭavarṣaṃ brāhmaṇam upanayīta" is also quoted three or four times in The Mimāṃsāślokavārttika with the Commentary Kāśikā of Sucaritamiśra. Trivandrum 1926, 1929, 1943. (Trivandrum Sanskrit Series, 90, 99, 150).

I do not know of any such occurrence in śruti -- perhaps it is "lost śruti"; anyway, it would have to be "gṛhya śruti" such as Śatapatha Br. 11.5.4.1 ff.

GobhilaGS 2.2.1: aṣṭavarṣaṃ brāhmaṇam upanayed garbhāṣṭame vā |1|

The first sentence of your printed version =
ĀśvGS 1.19.1, KhādiraGS 2.4.1 (as printed anyway)

BaudhGS 2.5.5 and ĀpDhS 1.1.1.24 both prescribe age 10 for the annādyakāma; I have never seen 6 for this.  I have digital versions of all GSs, but I cannot find exactly your passage, or the latter half thereof.

In the GSs, there is no general agreement that the appropriate age for Brahmins to be initiated is eight -- but it becomes standard only in the Dharmasūtras (I have written about the patterns underlying the disagreements in a 2005 article.)  Hence I am skeptical that there was ever a śruti passage that prescribed it.  (Vaikhānasa is too late to cite as support for such a notion; it may have an expansive notion of śruti.)

Tim

Timothy Lubin
Professor of Religion
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, Virginia 24450






From: Martin Gansten <martin.gansten@pbhome.se>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:31:49 +0200
To: Indology <indology@list.indology.info>
Subject: [INDOLOGY] Dharmasastra quotation on upanayana

Balabhadra in his Hāyanaratna quotes an unnamed text on the preferred
time of upanayana. The MSS I have seen all give the quotation as:

aṣṭavarṣaṃ brāhmaṇam upanīyayet ṣaṣṭhe ’nnādyakāma iti

The printed text cleans this up as follows:

aṣṭame varṣe brāhmaṇam upanayet ṣaṣṭhe ’nnādyakāma iti

-- but I don't know whether this corrected version exactly matches any
actual text. Any help in placing the quotation would be much appreciated.

Martin Gansten

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info