Chatterjee Ś?stri, Heramba. 1971. The Law of Debt in Ancient India. Calcutta, Sanskrit College Calcutta. (Calcutta Sanskrit College Research Series, LXXV)
Derrett, J. Duncan M. 1962. The Development of the Concept of Property in India c. A.D. 800-1800. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 64 ,15-130, elaborating on the RNadAnavidhi chapter in the 14th cent. VivAdaratnAkara
Best wishes, Axel
Dear Jonathan,Charles Malamoud's classic articles on debt also appear in his Cooking theWorld (Oxford, 1996). I will send the "Theology of Debt" piece to you. Forthe Dharmasastra view, as always, one should begin with Kane, History ofDharmasastra, Vol. 3, pp.411ff. The most thorough Indological treatment ofdebt, however, is Heramba Chatterjee Sastri, The Law of Debt in AncientIndia (1971). For what it's worth, I have a chapter on debt in the Spiritof Hindu Law (Cambridge, 2010). Finally, I can't help but mention DavidGraeber's sprawling and wonderfully provocative Debt: A History of the First5,000 Years, which includes ruminations on debt in ancient and medievalIndia. In all of this, I, like Patrick, have not seen a general forgivenessof debt as an act of state or other authority.Best, DonOn 5/21/2013 8:25 AM, Patrick Olivelle wrote:Jonathan:Debt (ṛṇādāna) is the first of the so-called Title of Law (vyavahārapada) --found in Kauṭilya's Arthaśāstra and Manu -- this is taken as the standard(prakṛti) legal dispute, and it is within this subject that most earlyauthors (Manu, Yājñavalkya) present legal procedure (evidence etc.). So debtwas a BIG DEAL in Indian thought, and it is from this that the theology ofinnate debts (Taittirīya Saṃhitā etc.) arose. But I do not see anywhere aconcept of forgiving debts -- such as Jubilee. The only comparable thing isthe rule that the interest cannot be reach a level more than the originalsum: thus what is ever payable is double what was borrowed. Once theinterest reaches that level, the principal ceases to accrue interest. Thereare ways around this, but that is a whole other story.Best,PatrickOn May 21, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Jonathan Silk wrote:dear Colleagues,I've been asked whether (tout court) Buddhism or Hinduism have any clearattitudes toward debt. I understand the question not to refer to spiritualdebt, but to monetary debt, and the origins of the questions to probably bewhether we find things comparable to the idea of the Jubilee, or theBiblical necessity to release Hebrew slaves after 7 years of service (theorigin of the Sabbatical, by the way!), and the like (at least as far as Iknow, there is no such provision in pre-modern India for manumission).Any advice would be most welcome, thanks!Jonathan--J. SilkInstituut Kern / Universiteit LeidenLeiden University Institute for Area Studies, LIASJohan Huizinga Building, Room 1.37Doelensteeg 162311 VL LeidenThe Netherlands_______________________________________________INDOLOGY mailing list_______________________________________________INDOLOGY mailing list_______________________________________________INDOLOGY mailing list