Times have changed since Carnap . I think analytic philosophy today is more of a style (use of formal language etc.) than disdain for metaphysics. Indeed, the continental vs. analytical talk seems anachronistic. 


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paolo Magnone <paolo.magnone@unicatt.it> wrote:
Well, of course logic is taught even in continental philosophy departments, besides much else… but you will concede that from a strictly analytical perspective, an English expression like “in western philosophy departments” translates with a universal, rather than an existential quantifier :-)




On 24/04/2013 17:35, Aleksandar Uskokov wrote:
It seems to me you've read too much from that simple statement. I for one was educated in an old-fashioned continental philosophy department, yet had to study both contemporary logic and history of logic in separate courses. I did not see a tout court equation in Howard's comment. 

Kind regards,
Aleksandar


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Paolo Magnone <paolo.magnone@unicatt.it> wrote:
Believe it or not, in some continental, yet undoubtedly western philosophy departments they still teach some old-fashioned philosophical subjects such as ontology and metaphysics... luckily (from my point of view) philosophy in the West has not yet generally become what the Anglosaxon world is trying to reduce it to. So it would be well advised not to make such sweeping statements equating “western philosophy” tout court with analytical philosophy.

Paolo Magnone
Sanskrit Language and Literature
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (Milan)

Jambudvipa  - Indology and Sanskrit Studies (www.jambudvipa.net)




On 24/04/2013 14:49, Howard Resnick wrote:
In western philosophy departments, logicians critique past theories and argue for what they believe is the best possible logic, but of course the history of logic theories is taught as well. Surely both are taught, at least somewhere, in Indian universities.

Howard Resnick

On Apr 23, 2013, at 9:42 PM, Veeranarayana Pandurangi <veerankp@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes sir.
Unlike in west we teach it as we think this is the science. We need to modify if it is no longer justified.

On Apr 24, 2013 12:17 AM, "Jean-Luc Chevillard" <jean-luc.chevillard@univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
You write

"I think we (naiyayikas) should not be teaching old paramaanu theory if it is really untenable."

This makes me wonder whether you see yourself as teaching theories
or as teaching the history of those theories.

How would you characterize what you do?

-- Jean-Luc Chevillard (Paris)


On 23/04/2013 20:05, Veeranarayana Pandurangi wrote:
Dear all

Sorry for crossposting.
I am searching for some realistic modern reveiws/ alternative theories
of paramaanu theory of nyayavaisheshika.

I think we (naiyayikas) should not be teaching old paramaanu theory if
it is really untenable.

--
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)





Messaggio istituzionale

Grazie a un gesto semplice puoi sostenere l'Ateneo dei cattolici italiani nella ricerca scientifica, nell'educazione dei giovani, nella solidarietà internazionale e nell'assistenza e cura dei malati del Policlinico "A. Gemelli".
Sottoscrivi il 5 per mille a favore dell'Università Cattolica.
Info: www.unicatt.it/5permille


_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
http://listinfo.indology.info





Messaggio istituzionale

Grazie a un gesto semplice puoi sostenere l'Ateneo dei cattolici italiani nella ricerca scientifica, nell'educazione dei giovani, nella solidarietà internazionale e nell'assistenza e cura dei malati del Policlinico "A. Gemelli".
Sottoscrivi il 5 per mille a favore dell'Università Cattolica.
Info: www.unicatt.it/5permille