Dear Jean-Luc,
I fail to see the relevance of your "bold" question. The fact is, I think, that fewer and fewer students want to take up Indian, especially classical Indian studies on a graduate level, since the job market is very restricted. It doesn't matter into which category the students happen to fall. Another sad fact is that more and more universities are into the numbers' game, i.e. the administrative authorities want to see large(r) classes, even on a graduate level. I believe that is what Dominik is
implying.  
Best
Stella
 
--
Professor Stella Sandahl
Department of East Asian Studies
130 St. George St. room 14087
Toronto, ON M5S 3H1
Tel. (416) 978-4295
Fax. (416) 978-5711



On 25-Sep-11, at 3:04 PM, Jean-Luc CHEVILLARD wrote:

Dear Dominik,

since this is a very bold statement,
let me ask one bold question:

When you say "students", are you thinking of:

*A* indian students (who have had their primary education in India)?

Or are you thinking of non-indian students,

*B* who have had their primary education in Europe, in the USA, in Canada, etc and

*C* some of whom might come from Indian migrant communities.

A, B and C
all have VERY different requirements
and it is important to think about the resemblances and the differences
in what they might expect from "guides" or from "compagnons de route"
(i.e. fellow researchers, having some seniority ;-)

Cheers

-- Jean-Luc (currently in Paris)


On 25/09/2011 20:31, Dominik Wujastyk wrote:
In a blog, a colleague suggested that in this INDOLOGY forum most of us would not be willing to say publicly that we are looking for students (at the MA or PhD level, for example).
Is this true?
Best,
Dominik